The Horse Forum
   

Double bridle. Why?

This is a discussion on Double bridle. Why? within the Dressage forums, part of the Riding Horses category;

Why are double bridles compulsory in upper level dressage? I can understand why they may be needed, but why is

...

Go Back   The Horse Forum > Riding Horses > Dressage
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-24-2009, 07:07 AM   #1
Weanling
 
ThatNinjaHorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 288
Horses: 1
Default Double bridle. Why?

Why are double bridles compulsory in upper level dressage? I can understand why they may be needed, but why is there a rule that it is a must? Ive seen these movements performed in snaffles (and bridleless etc) so why must they be compulsory? Not having this rule certainly wouldnt give competitors any advantage!
ThatNinjaHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 12:05 PM   #2
Green Broke
 
Spyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,652
Horses: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatNinjaHorse View Post
Why are double bridles compulsory in upper level dressage? I can understand why they may be needed, but why is there a rule that it is a must? Ive seen these movements performed in snaffles (and bridleless etc) so why must they be compulsory? Not having this rule certainly wouldnt give competitors any advantage!
Maybe for the same reason the Tour De France doesn't use a regular bike like all the rest of us.
Spyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 05:12 PM   #3
Weanling
 
ridergirl23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 258
Horses: 1
Default

i dont understand why it is mandatory either, probably for the same weird reason we arent aloud to puts spakles on our horses butts at shows.
haha maybe riders like anky just dont want to be shown up by a horse and rider without a bridle :P
ridergirl23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 07:15 PM   #4
Foal
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 170
Horses: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ridergirl23 View Post
haha maybe riders like anky just dont want to be shown up by a horse and rider without a bridle :P

Too funny! :)

I also don't see why it would be required. Maybe they think it gives the finishing touches or makes it look "better". To me the moves look just the same if not better when using a simple snaffle
SavvyHearts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 08:29 PM   #5
Chat Moderator
 
JustDressageIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 6,729
Horses: 4
Default

I haven't a clue why it's a rule. I mean, if one could possibly do the Tour de France on an everyday bike, why not?
JustDressageIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 09:23 PM   #6
Green Broke
 
MIEventer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Eventing Country
Posts: 3,158
Horses: 0
Default

Because it is tradition you guys. Same reason why you cannot wear a norma jacket in upper level dressage or wear a helmet.

Rules are rules you guys.

You follow your strict rules in your competative equestrian sport, so why would it be any different in upper level dressage?
MIEventer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 09:27 PM   #7
Yearling
 
Lucara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 765
Horses: 2
Default

I suppose its just the fact that they are competing at a professional level and expect the horses and riders to look the level their competing at.

I can go to a local show in half chaps and schooling breeches without any issues but I would assume that someone who is competing in the upper levels would be expected to dress according to the level their in.

Kinda like a a lawyer in a well known law firm is expected to dress the according to their career level, not like a Walmart employee.

I don't think it has anything to do with what skills they have, I think its just a dresscode like anything else.
Lucara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 09:38 PM   #8
Weanling
 
ridergirl23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 258
Horses: 1
Default

ugh the only thing i dont like about dressage is how traditional itis, haha but i also do like that part :P haha i STILL think its cuz the upper level riders dont want to be shown up bye some person without a bridle on their horse :P
ridergirl23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 09:45 PM   #9
Green Broke
 
MIEventer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Eventing Country
Posts: 3,158
Horses: 0
Default

Quote:
STILL think its cuz the upper level riders dont want to be shown up bye some person without a bridle on their horse :P
Are you serious?
MIEventer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 09:49 PM   #10
Weanling
 
ridergirl23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 258
Horses: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MIEventer View Post
Are you serious?
haha no, that was a joke lol
ridergirl23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
pelham vs double bridle savvylover112 Horse Training 5 07-17-2009 08:42 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2