Put a dressage rider in the hunter ring, put a classical rider in the modern ring=? - Page 3
   

       The Horse Forum > Riding Horses > English Riding > Dressage

Put a dressage rider in the hunter ring, put a classical rider in the modern ring=?

This is a discussion on Put a dressage rider in the hunter ring, put a classical rider in the modern ring=? within the Dressage forums, part of the English Riding category
  • Hunter under saddle vs dressage
  • What does hunter ring maen

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
    08-24-2010, 08:01 AM
  #21
Showing
Quote:
Originally Posted by maura    
Let's get rid of the false premise, that hunters and dressage are judged on the same objective standard and hunters somehow fail to measure up, once and for all. A dressage rider in the hunter ring will not kick butt, and a hunter rider in the dressage ring will fight against their forward seat training and struggle to adapt. A dressage rider, in a full seat, riding a dressage quality gait, is going to look pretty silly in the hunter ring and is going to do the opposite of well. The goals of the two disciplines are *different*; it's comparing apples and oranges.
You put it great, maura! What about western riders than? We can go ahead and compare say cutters or reiners vs jumpers. Why not?
     
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
    08-24-2010, 10:05 AM
  #22
Banned
Criticizing hunters and hunter riders by comparing them to dressage horses and riders is like criticizing a human track and field athlete running the 440 hurdles for not sticking their landings like gymnasts. It only requires that you ignore the goal of the individual discipline before making the comparison.
     
    08-24-2010, 10:09 AM
  #23
Banned
Outside of Equitation the horse is being judged in the hunter ring. So if you take out the rider factor a dressage horse CAN and does do well, even wins in the hunter ring.
     
    08-24-2010, 10:20 AM
  #24
Banned
Yes, that's true. In a Hunter under saddle class, a dressage horse can and does do very well IF it's shown in a training level frame or allowed to move in huntery frame. And yes, it would be easier to show a dressage horse in a hunter under saddle class and pin well that it would be to take a hunter and show training level dressage and do well - you'd have to ask the hunter to carry more frame and move through its back; though I think there are some horses who could make the switch quite well.

It's still true, though, that at a rated show and a rated division, the under saddle portion is 25% of the division (used to be 1/3, back in the day, but it was decided to lessen the emphasis on the flat and increase the importance of over fences.) The dressage horse would require some signifigant schooling to compete in the over fences portion.

None of which changes the fact that the original post in this thread starts with a faulty premise, an apples to oranges comparison, and an offensive, discipline-centric, chauvinistic point of view.
     
    08-24-2010, 10:28 AM
  #25
Banned
Quote:
Originally Posted by maura    

It's still true, though, that at a rated show and a rated division, the under saddle portion is 25% of the division (used to be 1/3, back in the day, but it was decided to lessen the emphasis on the flat and increase the importance of over fences.) The dressage horse would require some signifigant schooling to compete in the over fences portion.

.

It is interesting that my boy's sire competed and won at the Tournmant of Champions in dressage (rated) and in the hunter ring (rated) in under saddle and over fences. He was a natural for both, and my boy has also done the exact same thing.

Like father like son I guess.
     
    08-24-2010, 10:30 AM
  #26
Banned
Cool! Who was your horse's sire?

BTW, still doesn't make the OP's original point valid. I'd just like to know about the horse.
     
    08-24-2010, 10:45 AM
  #27
Green Broke
^^^I am not entirely sure there was a clear point in the OP other than to say that dressage riders are better than hunter riders. And then later to say that classical dressage riders are better than modern dressage riders. When in actual fact there is bad riding and bad form in all diciplines.

Any rider that has a true desire to enhance their skills will seek out knowledge and training that will enable them to excell in WHATEVER they are doing. Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that many diciplines would benefit from a greater understanding of classical dressage as it is one of the oldest and most refined Equestrian activities? Not to say that any other dicipline is less refined as such, just that the principles of classical dressage have been established for centuries and are widely applicable for some of the newer diciplines.
     
    08-24-2010, 04:13 PM
  #28
Weanling
Quote:
Originally Posted by maura    
This thread starts off with a false premise: and then veers accidently onto a correct premise worthy of discussion re: classical vs. modern dressge.
That is the point of this thread, I put a bad title on. I just wanted something to compare it to which was hunter vs. dressage.

To all the hunter riders who have replied to this thread. I never said hunters was really easy, I said it was different. What I mean by putting a dressage rider in the hunter ring is that the change is easier from dressage to hunter than from hunter to dressage. To jump a horse properly, you have to be a good rider and really, it can be dressage with jumps if it is done properly: to get the horse balanced before, over, and after the jump. To get impulsion, rhythm and suppleness.
     
    08-24-2010, 04:54 PM
  #29
Banned
The goals of modern vs. classical dressage are the same; though the methods differ; both the goals and methods of hunter seat equitation and dressage riding are very, very different. Still a bad and inaccurate comparision.

"Dressage with jumps" accurately describes showjumping, and sadly, some xc event courses these days; but does not accurately describe hunter seat riding.
     
    08-24-2010, 05:05 PM
  #30
Showing
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spyder    
It is interesting that my boy's sire competed and won at the Tournmant of Champions in dressage (rated) and in the hunter ring (rated) in under saddle and over fences. He was a natural for both, and my boy has also done the exact same thing.

Like father like son I guess.
I assume they were trained for both dressage and over fences..?

To be honest, I didn't quite get the original post. Does OP mean you take dressage horse with zero training in jumping and throw it in jumping ring? I highly doubt ANY horse would do well in anything without extensive training put in.
     

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Palominos in the Hunter Ring hunterequlover781 English Riding 56 04-15-2011 09:59 PM
Hunter Ring Attire kchfuller Horse Show Clothing 11 01-22-2010 11:33 PM
Plaid in the hunter ring? nirvana Horse Show Clothing 4 01-14-2010 08:45 PM
Do you think she would do well in the hunter ring? ilovelucy English Riding 7 03-23-2009 07:56 PM
Black tack in the hunter ring? mojo7777 Horse Tack and Equipment 13 11-12-2008 02:48 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0