Under section D "The defendant is Prohibited from, repeatedly and with out reasonable couse, stalking or following the plaintiff"
Under section E "The defendant is Prohibited from, repeatedly and with out reasonable couse, being at or in the vicinty of the planiniffs home,school, buisness or Place of empyolyment"
So here something I do not understand here. Person B came into walmart and hanging around and left with out buying anything. Also Person A hears he coming back to work on Monday same shift and working same place which means Person A will have to speak to him and deal with him. So walmart going to force the issues and have them work together? I am for one Peed off about this.
When Person B was hanging around Person A department the cops said they can not do anything because it's a public place.... Walmart is not a public place it's a store on private propety and he should not be able to shop there when Person A working. So what reasonable course for him to be around? Most of all he been coming to the store a few times not buying nothing. Hell coming to Person A work place to shop not a good reason as you have other stores around the area like hanafords etc?
So too the reply that Person A got from the police what's the point in having a Protection order against someone when you your not going to enforce the papers. Person B even said at the court walmart policey that they can not having Person B working when the order is active... yet he is returning to work?
We live in Maine and if any one has experiance with this give their 2 cents it would be great.
I just can't understand how the police can not act on this other been lazy? I mean I found 3 links to a news sites cops called at Walmart to arrest the defendant because he at the work place with no course. (different state mind you)