Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Just south of sanity
Hmmm, I read the article.
It said that the judge, jury, and vets viewed the unedited tape and could find no evidence of abuse by Mr. Conklin or members of his family.
Apparently, the person making the video may have been responsible for some of the attacks on the animals, and the video was edited in such a way as to make it look like an employee was doing it.
The edited version was horrible, and made to elicit an emotional response from people, which it obviously did. I saw it. It was sickening.
So shame on the people who filmed and edited that video. I hope Mr. Conklin sues them for everything they're worth.