Horse Rescues. Answering common questions and concerns. - Page 3 - The Horse Forum
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #21 of 26 Old 01-16-2013, 11:31 AM
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 5,685
• Horses: 0
That's the point. We, as owners, know best. Or should anyway.
There will be cases when a horse, or any other animal, beats the odds. But in cases like the one I mentioned, the 27 year old with three colic surgeries, it's downright cruel to keep trying.

Maybe if rescues would start selling, without strings attached, the healthy useful horses, after rehabbing and making them good citizens, for a a higher price and adopt out the elderly and special needs one's with attached strings, and finish the miserable, incurable lives, they'd have a better overall name and more space.
deserthorsewoman is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #22 of 26 Old 01-16-2013, 01:32 PM Thread Starter
Teen Forum Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South East Texas
Posts: 7,157
• Horses: 2
Wow, this thread blew up pretty quickly! Thats good ;) what I wanted was a discussion, not everyone telling me that I was right.

I'll try to answer everyone as thoroughly as possible. After all the point of this thread wasn't just to 'educate' you, but me as well. I do realize that I am only one focal point in many when it comes to this type of situation so I am definitely willing to discuss and think about anything that you guys say, just as I'm hoping you all are willing to do!

I'll first start out by making myself just a bit clearer about the funding on Kenzie, the filly in question. I appologize for not being clear in the beginning. The rescue in and of itself has put about an average amount of money into her (my view of 'average' anyways, I don't KNOW the actual stats) and I think that runs up to about $1,200. That has included an initial veterinary visit from their veterinarian, fecal, a blood panel, her first farrier visit, feed, and 1/3 of the veterinary bills. They were actually willing to put her down, as you might have read if you are following Kenzie's thread. Being that BEFORE the EHV though, she had a fairly good prognosis (light trail or all around horse, perhaps light competing) we as fosters did not feel like she needed to be put down quite yet. The rest of the money spent has been 'eaten' by the farm where I work simply because we did not want to give up quite so easily. So technically, about $4,700 of the dollars were unnecessary and of our own accord. The rescue did not fund any of her veterinary treatment as a EHV case, and is merely paying her 'upkeep' bills right now of feed, farrier work, etc. This was agreed upon for any and all fosters brought into our farm.

Should we have put Kenzie down when she was diagnosed with EHV? Perhaps. We don't have a guarentee that she will be sound at all when all is said and done, and she very likely be put down if we can't find her a home within a year or two of her being rehabilitated as fully as possible. However, it hardly seemed fair in our eyes to judge her productivity as a healthy adult while she is still battling a life threatening virus. A much better assessment can be made with some good food in her and her pressure sores, swelling from lying down constantly, and feet healed. Do remember that the fact that she can barely trot is very likely due to the fact that she came to us with four feet full of thrush, a still-healing shoulder (mostly aesthetic. No muscle was damaged by the actual tear thankfully!), and stocked up legs from lying down so much. She is also very, very malnourished which likely plays a part in her lethargy.

I do realize that it could be just the opposite as well though. Maybe she WON'T be anything more than a pasture sound hay-eater and maybe we won't be able to 'fix' her. At that point as fosters we would very likely stop funding her extra veterinary care and allow her to be adopted her out as just a buddy or be put to sleep. But she will at least have been given a chance.

I do agree that some rescues do go overboard when it comes to throwing money into certain cases. I'm sure that the rescue in question is guilty of this just as much as any other rescue is. But aren't many (not all) horse owners 'guilty' of the same thing? Chiropractic work, acupuncture, surgeries to remove or repair once-fatal injuries, months and months of stall rest, extremely expensive, special diets...they are all doing the same thing with their animals. It isn't necessarily a bad thing since it IS their horse and their money, but it COULD be considered a 'waste' of money on a possibly-useless horse. But often doing those things do help the horse recover to become useful animals again.

I think what we loose sight of fairly easily is the fact that we seem to think that it is horse rescue's 'duty' to heal and poop out as many useful horses as possible, as fast as possible, while spending as little as possible. Much like a factory. And while that would be nice, and absolutely optimal, it isn't quite how things always work. A horse that only needs to be 'rehabilitated' for a little sprain that was going to cost it it's life, or that has been a little bit too spoiled or overfed will definitely bring more PROFIT, but should rescues REALLY be about more profit? IMO that wouldn't make them a rescue, it would make them a horse broker. A horse with small issues like that can just as easily be rehabilitated by an experienced horse person who went to the auction looking for a sorry case, as a few of you mentioned.

I think I'm loosing my train of thought here and going off on tangents xD I appologize. I'll try to get back on subject again.

A few of you mentioned rescues that do not give papers with their horses. I DO agree that doing so is rediculous, because it DOES limit the horse's marketability and usability later on. And we all know that just because a horse has no papers doesn't mean people won't breed them O_o since apparently the latest trend is to add a 'little of this and a little of that' to make some fancy heinz 57 horse that is 'great at everything!' ha. Anyways, I don't believe that our rescue 'confinscates' those, but I do think we ask a higher price for them just to 'weed out' the back yard breeders as best we can. I don't condone any rescue that does refuse to give out papers though, just to be clear.

As for some of the sorry creatures that you guys have mentioned, including the belgian with that horrific looking leg (I almost didn't believe the picture! o.o) and the 27 year old with the three colic surgeries, I do think that the rescues were in the wrong trying to save those animals. I absolutely see it differently though, when you have a potentially very nice horse that has undergone some trauma. They're sort of diamonds in the rough. Kenzie was given only 'normal' treatment for her EHV which included anti-inflamatories, banamine, IV fluids, and an antibiotic for secondary infection, and if she had required any sort of surgery or such, would probably not be here today. We actually had the option of having her stay at the equine clinic in a sling to keep her body from 'quitting on us' but we refused because we didn't believe that we should go quite that extreme with her. If she died with what we were able to offer her, she did. But if she had the will to live and the ability to pull through even after being down for almost a week, then you'd better believe we were going to let her do just that. And she did. She's not 100% yet, and maybe she won't get to 100%, but she is on the road to recovery and acting very much like athe unhandled, curious yearling that she is- whether that a good or bad thing xD

She's a lovely filly but as attached as I am to her, I can see the point of view that many of you hold in saying that theres a lot of risk attached to her, and all of this could possibly be for naught. That being said, you can decide for yourself whether what we did was right or wrong. There isnt any 'for sure' answer, I don't think, because none of us can tell the future. Only time will tell whether our efforts will be worth it.

As for rescue's being more objective and better at discernment when it comes to which horses to save and which to euthenize, that IS definitely a big problem. However, when every one that sees it that way rallies AGAINST the rescues and allows the rescues to continue functioning the way that they are, that doesn't really solve anything either. I truely believe that if more horsemen such as those of you who are bringing this up started to influence rescues (not necessarily as sponsors, fosters, adoptors, etc- but even just as voices that need to be heard) we could change things for the better. Its one thing to just talk about how bad something is but not want to take steps to change it- its another to go out there and try to change it. If enough people try, something is bound to happen right? That goes for many of the problems that rescues have, not just as far as discernment goes. Budgeting, attaching strings to horses, adopting out, etc...all of those things definitely need reformed. But they can't be reformed if no one gives options on how to reform them! The more we leave rescues out 'on their own' the more they're going to act like silly teenagers (no offense to myself ofourse! LOL) and do rash, poorly planned out things. They need people to tell them how to better themselves, and where they're screwing up!

I'm trying to remember if theres anything I haven't answered. If there is, feel free to bring it up again. I'm not purposely ignoring anything. I also don't mind being called out on faulty reasoning, as I'm sure that I had at least some in this post. I don't claim to know everything or be the best debater in the world! :)

DesertHorse- something like you said would definitely be optimal. Of course in cases like our little filly though, she still would have died a terrible death, but I do realize that not every horse can be saved. At least with that kind of solution, more horses would be adopted out so more could be brought in.
grayshell38 likes this.

Everyone in your life is meant to
be in your journey, but not all of
them are meant to stay till the end.

Last edited by Endiku; 01-16-2013 at 01:38 PM.
Endiku is offline  
post #23 of 26 Old 01-16-2013, 01:56 PM
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 5,685
• Horses: 0
Sometimes I do have a brainstorm
But seriously, I don't see nothing wrong if rescues rehab, retrain and sell with a profit, provided for the higher price are no strings attached apart from the above mentioned protection contract, as long as the money goes into saving more horses. It could give them a good name and once word gets out, more and more people would " use" that service. And I bet one or the other pasture buddy would be adopted also.
deserthorsewoman is offline  
post #24 of 26 Old 01-16-2013, 02:11 PM
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Just south of sanity
Posts: 16,387
• Horses: 3
Endiku, even if they're a licensed 501(c)3 I see no harm in them making a profit from selling horses, which can then be returned back in to the rescue's bankroll and used to help other needy horses.

Again, rescues are businesses and need to be treated as such. Just because most of their money comes from donations shouldn't make them any less responsible. In fact, it should make them more responsible, since it's important that they make rational decisions when it comes to other peoples' money.

I know for a fact that a lot of rescues get a bad rap because they deserve it. They think they shouldn't be questioned, and don't believe they should be transparent with where the money is going or how it's used. Nope, sorry. They should be required to be even more transparent than a for-profit business, especially if they're counting on repeat donors.

As far as the 1,000 mile strings attached contracts, they're only shooting themselves in the foot. If I pay someone a hefty sum for a horse, it's mine. They don't get to come back later and say it was 'only adopted' and get to retain the rights to it.

I like the way TRF operates. You 'donate' a certain amount for a horse, they ask for 6 and 12 month follow ups, and at 12 months the horse becomes yours. TRF will take it back later if you get in a bind, but after that 12 months the animal is yours free and clear to do with what you will.

You want the truth? You can't HANDLE the truth!

Last edited by Speed Racer; 01-16-2013 at 02:14 PM.
Speed Racer is offline  
post #25 of 26 Old 01-16-2013, 02:18 PM
Green Broke
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Surry, Va
Posts: 4,712
• Horses: 0
refusing to have anything to do with strings attached rescues and supporting the no strings ones, is pretty much the only way to influence any business. Vote with your wallets.
Joe4d is offline  
post #26 of 26 Old 01-16-2013, 07:20 PM Thread Starter
Teen Forum Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South East Texas
Posts: 7,157
• Horses: 2
Sorry if I'm being an idiot, what is TRF?

I'm not for the huge strings attached either, but I do think that follow ups (even unannounced ones) are something that are necessary in many ways. I also don't think that being a little stingy (not terribly so) about WHO can adopt is a good idea too. Not that is ALWAYS weeds out the bad ones, but it does help. Things like requiring you to have some horse experience, a vet and farrier lined up, etc should be required because if you don't have that, ten to one you don't need to be BUYING a horse, much less adopting one with potential problems.

I'm not against rescues making money either, but how they make it definitely matters, and I don't think it should be the main goal. While many, I'm sure, will disagree, I personally believe that what sets rescues apart is the fact that they're compassionate. Compassion is almost a bad word these days to money hungry people, but its something that our world is very cruel and dark without.

That being said, I definitely don't deny that many rescues deserve the names that they make for themselves. I just want to point out that there are good rescues out there. I think that regulations being put on them and perhaps making them give annual reports is a great idea though. I'm not sure that I believe that the government really has a place doing the regulating though...that could get messy and fast.

Everyone in your life is meant to
be in your journey, but not all of
them are meant to stay till the end.
Endiku is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Horse Forum forums, you must first register.

Already have a Horse Forum account?
Members are allowed only one account per person at the Horse Forum, so if you've made an account here in the past you'll need to continue using that account. Please do not create a new account or you may lose access to the Horse Forum. If you need help recovering your existing account, please Contact Us. We'll be glad to help!

New to the Horse Forum?
Please choose a username you will be satisfied with using for the duration of your membership at the Horse Forum. We do not change members' usernames upon request because that would make it difficult for everyone to keep track of who is who on the forum. For that reason, please do not incorporate your horse's name into your username so that you are not stuck with a username related to a horse you may no longer have some day, or use any other username you may no longer identify with or care for in the future.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Old Thread Warning
This thread is more than 90 days old. When a thread is this old, it is often better to start a new thread rather than post to it. However, If you feel you have something of value to add to this particular thread, you can do so by checking the box below before submitting your post.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
final days of pregnancy...bunch of questions need answering jazzyrider Horse Breeding 38 09-30-2010 07:53 PM
Common cues and "jogging" questions Wallaby Western Riding 8 09-01-2009 06:22 PM
A few ?s... help with my senior project by answering whataryder Horse Shows 7 01-31-2008 03:01 PM
School Answering Machine sparky Jokes and Funnies 7 10-01-2007 01:58 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome