AI or Live cover?
 
 

       The Horse Forum > Horse Breeds, Breeding, and Genetics > Horse Breeding

AI or Live cover?

This is a discussion on AI or Live cover? within the Horse Breeding forums, part of the Horse Breeds, Breeding, and Genetics category
  • Live cover or AI
  • Danger mare live cover

Like Tree5Likes

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
    03-09-2013, 10:16 PM
  #1
Green Broke
Question AI or Live cover?

Which do you prefer? AI or Live cover?

I am doing a school project and it is all about AI vs Live cover.

1. Which do you prefer?
2. Could you list your reason why?

You can also give your reasoning and Pros vs Cons for each one.
     
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
    03-11-2013, 12:17 PM
  #2
Banned
There is nothing wrong with AI to my knowledge, but I prefer pasture breeding mine. Perhaps it is irrational, but I strongly believe in keeping things as natural as reasonably possible - pasture breeding and pasture foaling with the herd. My horses are all extremely content, mild mannered, healthy, and have excellent dispostions, and although I cannot prove anything scientifically, I feel much of that has to do with letting them be horses and following their instincts instead of undergoing the man-induced stress of confinement...
dbarabians and xxdanioo like this.
     
    03-11-2013, 12:19 PM
  #3
Yearling
If I had the chance with a good stud I would prefer pasture breeding HOWEVER due to the extreme lack of anything but cow horses around here I opt for A.Iing this year when breeding for a HUS horse.
     
    03-11-2013, 12:25 PM
  #4
Trained
I prefer live cover. Its typically cheaper and easier to deal with.

AI usually involves hauling mare to vet, numerous ultrasounds to find where she is in her cycle, more vet fees, hauling her home. Keep in mind, you want a vet that specializes in equine reproduction too!

I tried breeding Chilly 7 years ago thought AI. She never took and I was out $1500 between stud fee, collection, shipping and vet fees. It was very hard to track her cycle because she was a silent heat type of mare back then.

Chilly was bred in April 2012, was with the stud for 4 days, and she conceived without even trying. LoL

Overall, I prefer live cover mainly due to the cost and simplicity of it. As long as your dealing with capable owners and a nicely trained stud.

But...When I breed Rumor, she'll be bred to a stallion that is half way across the country. So, AI it is...But this stallion is worth it.
Posted via Mobile Device
xxdanioo likes this.
     
    03-11-2013, 01:51 PM
  #5
Green Broke
Thanks :)

Frozen semen is only 65% percent viable, whereas live cover semen are 80% - 90% viable.
     
    03-11-2013, 02:14 PM
  #6
Started
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray MacDonald    
Thanks :)

Frozen semen is only 65% percent viable, whereas live cover semen are 80% - 90% viable.
But some of those statistics are because stallions with lower viable sperm are used in AI programs to increase their fertility rates. If they were allowed to live cover, they're rates would be even lower. (did that make sense?) Referring to fresh not frozen.
     
    03-11-2013, 02:42 PM
  #7
Green Broke
Thoroughbreds have to be live, in hand cover. AI not an option.

AI is easier though, and if can collect from own stallion, can "breed" several mares from one collection too.
Ray MacDonald likes this.
     
    03-12-2013, 09:55 AM
  #8
Yearling
Quote:
Originally Posted by Palomine    
Thoroughbreds have to be live, in hand cover. AI not an option.
Only if the resulting foal is a thoroughbred. Im A.I.ing my thoroughbred but her foal with be AQHA/APHA.
     
    03-12-2013, 10:47 AM
  #9
Green Broke
Live cover for sure, if possible.

There is even one mare on the farm that will not conceive unless pasture bred, at home. She has been sent away for live cover at another barn, bred several times and would not conceive. Put her in the stallions pastureon the farm and she catches first try, every time.
     
    03-12-2013, 03:56 PM
  #10
Green Broke
After working on a Warmblood breeding operation, I say AI. Pasture breeding is great if you actually maintain your own herd. When bringing in outside mares, it's just not feasible - the risk of injury is too great to mix a bunch of unknown horses together in a pasture during breeding time. In hand live cover can be stressful and dangerous if you're unsure how the mare may react.

Collecting live semen means more mares bred that day. We had close to 100% success rate by using a teaser gelding, collecting from the stallion and immediately distributing the fresh semen to the mares in heat that day. Often only required 1 or 2 inseminations to take.

I think ultimately the answer is - depends on your individual situation. For large scale breeding operations handling expensive horses, AI is just safest. I would prefer pasture cover second. In hand live cover last because I think it creates the most risks and danger for both horses and handlers to have NO ability to act out a natural breeding encounter.
Posted via Mobile Device
     

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any way a 12 hh stud can live cover a 16 hh mare? NittanyEquestrian Horse Breeding 27 03-22-2010 11:39 PM
AI vs Live Cover? ilovemyPhillip Horse Breeding 33 07-08-2009 09:37 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0