Quality of first foal vs. later foals - Page 2
   

       The Horse Forum > Horse Breeds, Breeding, and Genetics > Horse Breeding

Quality of first foal vs. later foals

This is a discussion on Quality of first foal vs. later foals within the Horse Breeding forums, part of the Horse Breeds, Breeding, and Genetics category

    Like Tree8Likes

     
    LinkBack Thread Tools
        05-26-2012, 07:25 AM
      #11
    Showing
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Faceman    
    Humans are a bit different than horses. It has been well demonstrated and documented that first born humans are far superior in both physical and mental attributes to their lesser siblings...and if it were not so, I would draw upon my first born intellect and abilities to make it so...
    Pfffttttt!!

    I'm the 3rd child. The first has a different mom but same father, the second has the same mom and dad as I. The first one was a model with success in the fashion industry, the second one is a genius but socially awkward, and the third is compassionate, doesn't take **** from anybody, really nice, and amazing with people and animals.

    I say I won out :P

    Jokes aside, all offspring have their faults and their winning qualities.
         
    Sponsored Links
    Advertisement
     
        05-26-2012, 07:27 AM
      #12
    Showing
    I agree with that the first born in humans is the superior offspring Face. Just don't tell my younger sister.

    I've heard the old wives tales about which foal will be the best. One of my grandfather's friends (he's in his 80s) swears that the best one is the 2nd foal with a dam that's 10 years old. It's hogwash.

    My old black mare for example, she's had 9 foals over her lifetime. They have all been great foals. I will admit that I liked the blacks better than her bays but color doesn't make quality.
    Posted via Mobile Device
    FlyGap likes this.
         
        05-26-2012, 07:48 AM
      #13
    Green Broke
    I think the origin of it is based in fact to be honest. You can predict what a mare will pass on to her foal, but you can't tell for certain. The first foal is a bit of a pot luck, because you have no prior foals to compare sires to if that makes any sense at all? So your first foal is the "test case" and the next few you start to narrow down what your mare crosses well with.
         
        05-26-2012, 02:17 PM
      #14
    Yearling
    I don't think it would be the same comparing them to humans (although my oldest sister is the shortest of the bunch, my youngest is the second shortest! I'm leaning towards the middle being the best). I have noticed it does seem to be true w/ cattle, so could see it also being true w/ horses, but then heifers are generally bred younger then horses.

    I've thought on the foals we've had that I know were a mares first, and for many it does seem the first is shorter, but the quality is still there.
         
        06-14-2012, 05:11 PM
      #15
    Weanling
    The only part I've ever found of this to be true is size of foal. They are usually smaller at birth from maiden mares. However.. they catch up later.
         

    Thread Tools

    Similar Threads
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    Lets talk about foals :) Appaloosa foal GhostwindAppaloosa Horse Conformation Critique 38 06-01-2012 09:24 AM
    Im on a foal drawing craze!! I need pictures of foals to draw!! PintoTess Horse Artwork 66 04-23-2011 08:58 PM
    Horse quality hay vs. cow quality hay Puddintat Horse Nutrition 26 01-06-2011 05:12 AM
    2008,2009 and 2010 foals. I need YOUR foal pics! thunderhooves Horse Contests 70 04-08-2010 02:00 PM
    Foal, foal, cute little foal!!!!!!!! PIC OVERLOAD! DutchHorse Horse Pictures 9 07-21-2008 10:19 PM



    All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
    Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0