I am not starting this thread to discuss the NA foundling registries like the AWR or AWS but specifically the European registries.
Now I am not so familiar with the Dutch or Swedish so most of my posts will be directed at what I researched which are the German ones like the Hanoverian, Oldenburg, Westphalia etc.
The Trakheners are a separate but important part also.
Here is Maura's post that was an interesting post in that at least she realized that we must all have to start somewhere.
I learned some interesting things in this thread.
I hope I can comment on them without derailing the thread again.
I have always understood how the European Warmblood registries worked, and frankly admired them, both for their willingness to allow horses to be in multiple registries if each of the registries agrees that the horse has desirable traits, and the rigorous testing a horse must undergo to be approved breeding stock.
But I never really thought about the difference between registered and approved before. So if I were starting a registry and was trying to breed for a certain type, it makes sense to register as many horses as I possibly can - all I'm doing is collecting information in a database (bloodlines and traits, genotype and phenotype) , and frankly, collecting money from people who want to register their horses and have another venue in which to compete. Particularly in the case of geldings, the quality of the animal registered isn't all that material.
Now, when it comes to APPROVAL, ie, approved as breeding stock, and representative of what you want to acheive in a breeding program, that's critical. You need to be as rigorous as possible in what stock you approve to breed, the more rigorous you are, the sooner you will have an indentifiable type.
I really don't know anything about the AWS, but it seems to me that criticizing them for registering less than stellar horses is completely beside the point. The real litmus test of their value as a registry is the quality of the horse they approve for breeding.
I suspect that when the European warmblood registries first opened, the followed a similiar strategy - register everything, including Draft types and TBS, record their pedigrees and key traits, but only approve for breeding the horses that have the characteristics or the traits the registry deems desirable. Makes sense to start off that way.
It will still be decades before the AWS produces a recognizable type, but hey, the German warmblood registries have been around for centuries, right?