Paints are QH's with color??
   

       The Horse Forum > Horse Breeds, Breeding, and Genetics > Horse Breeds

Paints are QH's with color??

This is a discussion on Paints are QH's with color?? within the Horse Breeds forums, part of the Horse Breeds, Breeding, and Genetics category

     
    LinkBack Thread Tools
        11-23-2008, 01:27 AM
      #1
    Weanling
    Paints are QH's with color??

    I just read that in a post in the critique section and yet on my filly's Reg papers it says "this horse has white markings designated under AQHA rules as an undesirable trait and uncharacteristic of the breed" all because she has a patch of white hair with underlying pink skin on her left hind gaskin (and it ain't big either) She has been DNA typed, what is the need of putting that on her papers anyway?!
         
    Sponsored Links
    Advertisement
     
        11-23-2008, 03:10 AM
      #2
    Weanling
    They are, along with crosses, and TB's

    I don't know a whole lot when it comes to QH world under the AQHA. But that sounds about right.

    Don't feel bad, the APHA has its color regulations as well, and without enough white, you can end up with a "solid breed" registered paint. It used to be refered to as "Breedstock Paint".

    Each association canhave some pretty wild restrictions when it comes to color.
         
        11-23-2008, 04:14 AM
      #3
    Weanling
    Thanks for your reply Midwest I personally don't get all the color drama.......... a good horse is a good horse, is a good horse and I don't think his (her) color has a lot to do with it. I mean I love a pretty paint as much as the next person, but for the AQHA to state on her papers that my filly, (because she has a tiny white marking on her gaskin) has an "undesirable trait" that is "uncharacteristic of the breed" is ridiculous in my opinion! Why the hell would that matter? She's still as quick, still as sweet, still as spirited, still as AQHA (she has NO APHA in her heratige) as she would be if she didn't have a white spot on her gaskin..... oh wait...... is there some sort of scientific proof that a white spot causes a 3.5 second speed decrease or something??! NO.....I didn't think so. It's like comparing blonde , brunette and redheaded women, we're all women, we all have the same parts for crikey sake. Yeah go ahead dudes, you tell your brunette GF that she has an "undesirable" trait ........I dare Ya!!!!!!!!
         
        11-23-2008, 06:57 AM
      #4
    Green Broke
    The thing to remember is that the breed registries were formed by large breeders who had their own $$ interests in mind, not science or genetics, and they 'defined' what the breed was/is and the 'ideal' horse of the breed.
    Although I'm sure purists would disagree, QHs (solid or marked) and Paints (marked or solid) are indeed the 'same' horse.
    Our seasoned mare Angel (tobiano Paint) had a Paint sire and a QH dam. Why is she a Paint? Because she has the required Paint color/markings AND a Paint parent. Why isn't she a QH? Because a QH can't have her white and can't have a Paint parent.
    It is sad (IMHO) that the registristries use labels like 'undesireable trait', 'crop outs' and 'rejects'. What's even sadder is that at least years ago, unless these horse had some other trait the breeder thought was worth propagating, these horses were 'culled out'....and we all know what that means.
    A good horse is indeed a good horse, and our Paint mares love their QH 'cousins', too.
         
        11-23-2008, 03:06 PM
      #5
    Yearling
    Breed registry's can be pretty silly. My geldings sire is a black and white Tobiano who's double registered. As a Missouri Fox Trotter and as 'Spotted Saddle Horse'

    I just laugh and ask, "Whats the difference?!"

    Just snub your nose at the AQHA undesirable trait my rear. I bet it's a cute little spot.
         
        11-23-2008, 04:12 PM
      #6
    Trained
    I don't know why that is in place, but I don't see it as an undersierable trait at all, acutally I think it makes them a very unique QH.
         
        11-24-2008, 02:35 PM
      #7
    Started
    I don't fully know the reasoning... but I think AQHA doesnt want white because otherwise it would be more of a paint horse??? Not sure if that made sense..lol. But I think that are basically the same type of horse. Most are generally built the same, do the same as far as speed events, pleasure, etc... and you find bloodlines cross as well.
         
        11-24-2008, 04:12 PM
      #8
    Trained
    Yes but a QH is a QH a paint very well could be 95% and 5% paint.
         
        11-24-2008, 05:21 PM
      #9
    Green Broke
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by FehrGroundRanch    
    Yes but a QH is a QH a paint very well could be 95% and 5% paint.
    Please explain. QH (AQHA) and Paint (APHA) are registries, not zooligical classifications. They are QH and Paint by definition. If you look far enough back in both QH and Paint bloodlines, they all go back to crosses with TBs, Arabs, etc.
         
        11-24-2008, 05:25 PM
      #10
    Foal
    Ooooooookkkkk???? Lol.
         

    Thread Tools

    Similar Threads
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    Foal Color, help me guess what color he'll shed out.. frogtree Horse Breeding 11 04-25-2012 10:29 PM
    What do you do with your QH's mane? .Delete. Horse Grooming 15 05-12-2009 08:20 PM
    Discussion about Paints, specifically Breeding Stock Paints JustDressageIt Horse Breeding 22 03-23-2009 08:42 AM
    Paints! Brumby Horse Breeds 6 11-14-2008 01:31 PM
    My Cousin's QH's... FutureVetGirl Horse Riding Critique 2 08-07-2008 01:30 PM



    All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:25 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
    Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0