long backs and downhill vs. uphill questions - Page 2
 
 

       The Horse Forum > Horse Breeds, Breeding, and Genetics > Horse Colors and Genetics

long backs and downhill vs. uphill questions

This is a discussion on long backs and downhill vs. uphill questions within the Horse Colors and Genetics forums, part of the Horse Breeds, Breeding, and Genetics category
  • Horses built uphill vs. downhill
  • Correct conformation of a horse

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
    02-08-2011, 12:40 AM
  #11
Weanling
It also varies by breeds the correct conformation for a CS horse requires the back, neck, hip, and barrel to be about the same length...


From the Center for America's First Horse

Downhill conformation is considered a fault as it can lead to problems down the line
     
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
    02-08-2011, 07:56 AM
  #12
slc
Weanling
The length of the back is a separate issue - and most people don't have a good eye for length of back.

There are two parts of the back that make up its total length - the saddle piece, and the area behind the saddle. The saddle piece is the area behind the withers where the saddle is/will be. The area behind the saddle is far less supported, and length there, can be more of a problem than length in the saddle piece.

The 'length' of the back (overall) is relative to the other proportions of the horse - leg length, neck length. All 3 need to work well together. While there are rules for various systems of evaluating horses, there is room in sport for some variation in these proportions.

For example, a slightly longer backed horse may gallop rather well and do very good lateral work - as long as he doesn't have other faults that might add up and cause an issue, such as weak, narrow or stiff hind quarters. A shorter backed horse might be easier to bring together and balance, thought it might be harder for it to stretch out and cover ground - again, if it has other conformation faults. Each type has advantages and disadvantages.

It's important to remember that conformation faults tend to occur in groups, creating an an overall weakness. For example, a weakly muscled, long area behind the saddle, plus hind quarters that push out behind the horse, and straight hocks. It's important to learn to see the overall picture.

Too, each horse always represents an overall type - heavily boned, heavily built, vs very tall, leggy and fine. It is not so much that there is any specific 'conformation fault', it's whether the type is suitable to the intended use. For example, a draft horse can have a very good type - for a draft horse. But you probably wouldn't enter it into the Kentucky Derby. Type doesn't have to be that extreme to affect the use. People need to learn to see the overall type, and instead of criticizing every horse because it doesn't fit, say, for Western Pleasure or Reining, see what it IS good for.

To get a better eye for these proportions, you can learn to squint at the horse to blur out all details, and you will see more the overall proportions, instead of the details.

Keep in mind that it's very hard to evaluate a photograph. Photographs tend to distort proportions. A photo taken from below makes the legs look longer, a photo taken from above makes the legs look shorter. If the horse is stood up at an angle to the camera, his back can look overly long or overly short. In Quarter horse pictures, there's a tendency to pose the horse with its hind quarters at an angle toward the camera, to emphasize the hind quarters and make them appear larger. This angle makes the back look short when it is not.

The biggest error I see is people (esp on the bb's) declaring a horse has a 'short back' when it does not. This is probably the commonest error when people try to critique conformation. Often the photo angle, a deep chest or long neck wil fool the observer into thinking the back is 'short' when it isn't, but there is no real pattern to what causes people to not see the length of back.

Comparing the length of the horse's body overall, to leg length, can help. With a lot of practice and being corrected by a more experienced person, eventually a person will get an eye for this proportion.
     
    02-08-2011, 09:51 AM
  #13
Green Broke
Quote:
Originally Posted by slc    
The length of the back is a separate issue - and most people don't have a good eye for length of back.

There are two parts of the back that make up its total length - the saddle piece, and the area behind the saddle. The saddle piece is the area behind the withers where the saddle is/will be. The area behind the saddle is far less supported, and length there, can be more of a problem than length in the saddle piece.

The 'length' of the back (overall) is relative to the other proportions of the horse - leg length, neck length. All 3 need to work well together. While there are rules for various systems of evaluating horses, there is room in sport for some variation in these proportions.

For example, a slightly longer backed horse may gallop rather well and do very good lateral work - as long as he doesn't have other faults that might add up and cause an issue, such as weak, narrow or stiff hind quarters. A shorter backed horse might be easier to bring together and balance, thought it might be harder for it to stretch out and cover ground - again, if it has other conformation faults. Each type has advantages and disadvantages.

It's important to remember that conformation faults tend to occur in groups, creating an an overall weakness. For example, a weakly muscled, long area behind the saddle, plus hind quarters that push out behind the horse, and straight hocks. It's important to learn to see the overall picture.

Too, each horse always represents an overall type - heavily boned, heavily built, vs very tall, leggy and fine. It is not so much that there is any specific 'conformation fault', it's whether the type is suitable to the intended use. For example, a draft horse can have a very good type - for a draft horse. But you probably wouldn't enter it into the Kentucky Derby. Type doesn't have to be that extreme to affect the use. People need to learn to see the overall type, and instead of criticizing every horse because it doesn't fit, say, for Western Pleasure or Reining, see what it IS good for.

To get a better eye for these proportions, you can learn to squint at the horse to blur out all details, and you will see more the overall proportions, instead of the details.

Keep in mind that it's very hard to evaluate a photograph. Photographs tend to distort proportions. A photo taken from below makes the legs look longer, a photo taken from above makes the legs look shorter. If the horse is stood up at an angle to the camera, his back can look overly long or overly short. In Quarter horse pictures, there's a tendency to pose the horse with its hind quarters at an angle toward the camera, to emphasize the hind quarters and make them appear larger. This angle makes the back look short when it is not.

The biggest error I see is people (esp on the bb's) declaring a horse has a 'short back' when it does not. This is probably the commonest error when people try to critique conformation. Often the photo angle, a deep chest or long neck wil fool the observer into thinking the back is 'short' when it isn't, but there is no real pattern to what causes people to not see the length of back.

Comparing the length of the horse's body overall, to leg length, can help. With a lot of practice and being corrected by a more experienced person, eventually a person will get an eye for this proportion.
Wow, thanks for that in-depth post. I agree that I think sometimes people get so caught up in looking for one flaw that they fail to put everything together as a whole.
     
    02-08-2011, 06:57 PM
  #14
Yearling
I agree with slc. To put some basic guidelines for numbers on length of back, I was taught in one of my equine science labs that in general the back should be 1/2 the length of the underbelly (I believe it's 1/2). And the back length is measured from the withers to the croup, like so.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg back.jpg (20.3 KB, 137 views)
     

Quick Reply
Please help keep the Horse Forum enjoyable by reporting rude posts.
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Horse Forum forums, you must first register.

Already have a Horse Forum account?
Members are allowed only one account per person at the Horse Forum, so if you've made an account here in the past you'll need to continue using that account. Please do not create a new account or you may lose access to the Horse Forum. If you need help recovering your existing account, please Contact Us. We'll be glad to help!

New to the Horse Forum?
Please choose a username you will be satisfied with using for the duration of your membership at the Horse Forum. We do not change members' usernames upon request because that would make it difficult for everyone to keep track of who is who on the forum. For that reason, please do not incorporate your horse's name into your username so that you are not stuck with a username related to a horse you may no longer have some day, or use any other username you may no longer identify with or care for in the future.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Old Thread Warning
This thread is more than 90 days old. When a thread is this old, it is often better to start a new thread rather than post to it. However, If you feel you have something of value to add to this particular thread, you can do so by checking the box below before submitting your post.

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Questions about Pro - long post Pro Horse Training 3 06-30-2010 02:24 AM
Showing this weekend, just some questions! **LONG** eventerwannabe Horse Shows 46 10-27-2009 07:10 PM
I need LOTS of help! Many questions, very long! grayshell38 Horse Training 18 10-04-2009 01:07 AM
The uphill/downhill debate... Does it matter? Supermane Horse Riding Critique 13 01-24-2009 07:35 PM
A few questions about my mustang(LONG POST) RebelsRose Horse Training 14 06-27-2008 04:04 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0