Critique
 
 

       The Horse Forum > Horse Breeds, Breeding, and Genetics > Horse Conformation Critique

Critique

This is a discussion on Critique within the Horse Conformation Critique forums, part of the Horse Breeds, Breeding, and Genetics category

    Like Tree5Likes

     
    LinkBack Thread Tools
        12-08-2012, 05:11 AM
      #1
    Foal
    Critique

    Just seeing what ya'll think.
    This is my 12 year old Appaloosa sport horse stallion...





         
    Sponsored Links
    Advertisement
     
        12-08-2012, 10:16 AM
      #2
    Trained
    Just curious why he is still a stallion?
         
        12-08-2012, 11:59 AM
      #3
    Showing
    First thing that sticks out is that he's either standing under himself or sickle hocked.

    Somewhat upright shoulder.

    Nothing else glaring stands out.

    I do have the same question as franknbeans, though. Why is this guy still a stallion? To be quite frank, nothing about him is stallion material.
    Posted via Mobile Device
    franknbeans and Kilokitty like this.
         
        12-08-2012, 01:45 PM
      #4
    Green Broke
    He is OK. Not stallion material. He is a bit long in the back, insufficient hind quarter muscling and a bit sickle hocked. He has nice bone and a steep shoulder.
    The shoulder does not help him jumping.. nor do the sickle hocks. In the photo of him jumping, he does as his conformation would have him do. The steep shoulder does not allow him to get his forearms up and level so he compensates by folding his cannonsbecause he is careful (good boy!).

    He has an atypical large amount of muscling on the underside of his neck for a stallion.. which leads me to believe he travels with his head high and his bacdk hollow. Going back the the jumping photo.. this lack of proper development of his "ring of muscles" has his jumping looking like it takes a lot of effort.. instead of looking scopey over the fence.

    He is an OK horse but not something I would breed to. In fact.. he LOOKS like a gelding.
    Speed Racer likes this.
         
        12-08-2012, 04:15 PM
      #5
    Started
    The very first thing which jumped out at me, was his neck. Difficult to know whether that was acquired through incorrect training, or genetic. I do think he has a quite handsome head piece for his type. He does seems to have a rather straight shoulder. He is definitely sickle hocked too. Not as bad as many I've seen, but it's there, nevertheless. Too many rather major faults to be considered breeding material, but if you just like to keep him as a stallion without breeding him, then I see no problem.

    Lizzie
         
        12-08-2012, 04:35 PM
      #6
    Showing
    I was wondering about his neck. I thought it looked off and "upside down," especially for a stallion. Glad to see I'm not entirely crazy. Lol
    Posted via Mobile Device
         
        12-08-2012, 06:47 PM
      #7
    Super Moderator
    I think the first photo has the horse rocking back, as if getting ready to step backward, thus makes it look like he may be standing under himself or sickle hocked. I don't think that is the case.
    I do, however, think his neck is set on a bit low and is overdeveloped on the underside. He looks very sturdy overal.
         
        12-08-2012, 07:03 PM
      #8
    Showing
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by tinyliny    
    I think the first photo has the horse rocking back, as if getting ready to step backward, thus makes it look like he may be standing under himself or sickle hocked. I don't think that is the case.
    I do, however, think his neck is set on a bit low and is overdeveloped on the underside. He looks very sturdy overal.
    I don't know, tiny. I'm looking at that second pic and I'm seeing at least slightly sickle hocks.
    Posted via Mobile Device
         
        12-08-2012, 08:02 PM
      #9
    Green Broke
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by tinyliny    
    I think the first photo has the horse rocking back, as if getting ready to step backward, thus makes it look like he may be standing under himself or sickle hocked. I don't think that is the case.
    I do, however, think his neck is set on a bit low and is overdeveloped on the underside. He looks very sturdy overal.
    You could be correct on the hocks. The photos are not so hot.. and he is ridden and tacked up. Camera angles are not very good.

    I was going to say the neck was set low.. but that is hard to tell unless you REALLY look at the photo with him under tack only. The saddle hides his withers and the mane sticking up hides the top line of the neck.. and the neck is set low...

    .. and the low neck set reduces his ability to have scope over the fences.

    Sharp eye on the neck set Tiny!
         
        12-08-2012, 08:21 PM
      #10
    Foal
    Thanks guys, I'll take better profile pictures tomorrow when I go out with no tack.
    He is actually a long term lease that I've had for a couple months now. If I had it my way he would be gelded, but the owner didn't want me too, thus why he is still intact. I finally convinced her a couple weeks ago to get him gelded so showing would be easier for me next season. Soooo in a couple months this guy will be a gelding :P

    Oh and in that first picture, he isn't by any means square, he kept walking forward which is probably why he looks like he's underneath himself
    Endiku and smitty75 like this.
         

    Quick Reply
    Please help keep the Horse Forum enjoyable by reporting rude posts.
    Message:
    Options

    Register Now

    In order to be able to post messages on the The Horse Forum forums, you must first register.

    Already have a Horse Forum account?
    Members are allowed only one account per person at the Horse Forum, so if you've made an account here in the past you'll need to continue using that account. Please do not create a new account or you may lose access to the Horse Forum. If you need help recovering your existing account, please Contact Us. We'll be glad to help!

    New to the Horse Forum?
    Please choose a username you will be satisfied with using for the duration of your membership at the Horse Forum. We do not change members' usernames upon request because that would make it difficult for everyone to keep track of who is who on the forum. For that reason, please do not incorporate your horse's name into your username so that you are not stuck with a username related to a horse you may no longer have some day, or use any other username you may no longer identify with or care for in the future.

    User Name:
    Password
    Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
    Password:
    Confirm Password:
    Email Address
    Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
    Email Address:

    Log-in

    Human Verification

    In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


    Old Thread Warning
    This thread is more than 90 days old. When a thread is this old, it is often better to start a new thread rather than post to it. However, If you feel you have something of value to add to this particular thread, you can do so by checking the box below before submitting your post.

    Thread Tools

    Similar Threads
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    Canter critique- first time critique, please be nice lol Rachel1786 Horse Riding Critique 11 12-05-2012 12:00 AM
    Western Riding critique and confo critique on Romeo Pidge Horse Riding Critique 19 10-09-2012 03:21 AM



    All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
    Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0