Critique my Critique?
 
 

       The Horse Forum > Horse Breeds, Breeding, and Genetics > Horse Conformation Critique

Critique my Critique?

This is a discussion on Critique my Critique? within the Horse Conformation Critique forums, part of the Horse Breeds, Breeding, and Genetics category
  • Site www
  • Tied in conformation

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
    06-24-2013, 08:11 PM
  #1
Foal
Critique my Critique?

So I'm taking my H/A rating in Pony Club soon, and basically you are evaluated on your ability to make a sound conformation critique and asses what job a horse would do best at. I don't have anyone who can help me with this around here, so I figured I'd turn to the interwebs. I'm just going to post what I see and if you'd like to point out any things that I'm missing or have wrong I'd be eternally grateful!

Overall porportion seems pretty even, It's hard to tell about the length of neck, but I'd say it's not too long. Neck is set medium height, and of a good width/muscling. A nice sloping shoulder of a good length. Good length of the upper arm, but this horse looks tied in below the knee. Pasterns are a bit long and they are a bit flat. I like the length of back on this horse, might be a smidge long. This horse appears to stand camped out behind. The pastern angle on the hind leg does not match that of the front leg, it's much steeper. (this could be the footing or maybe shoeing? It's hard to see) Overall I would not peg this horse as a high performance horse (English or Western) because of the long/sloping front pasterns and the very upright hind pasterns. He should have a nice smooth stride because of the sloping shoulder but the camped out hind legs might make tracking up and achieving collection difficult. I'd say he'd be a good lower level dressage/trail horse. (I don't know much about the western events but I don't think WP wants long strides and I wouldn't peg him for speed events?)
Overall this horse gives a very good impression. Evenly porportioned on the large scale, he has only a very slight uphill balance. The neck is set high on his shoulder, which is sloping (50-55 degrees?). Nice forearm, but his pasterns are a tad long and flat. Medium/long back, medium length loin. The "triangle" in the hindquarters is equilateral, with all sides even. A high stifle indicates a lack of jumping scope. Nice dropped hocks, although he appears to toe out slightly behind. Relatively flat croup. I would peg this horse for dressage, maybe hunters. He should have a long stride due to the shoulder, and good collection faculties due to the angles of the hindquarter. Might not be as scopey due to the stifle placement. Should be light on the forehand because of the high neck set, but his lack of true uphill balance steers him away from high level jumping.

Thanks in advance!
     
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
    06-24-2013, 09:51 PM
  #2
Foal
Do you talk of all types of work the horses could do, not just WP/Dressage/Jumping, but carriage and others? The second horse looks a very good candidate for driving.

Note the shoulder angles, too. The first has open angles, freeing front end movement.

Be right back, ;)
     
    06-24-2013, 10:11 PM
  #3
Foal
We are definitely supposed to consider any career, you're totally right about the driving. I sometimes forget that horses can do things other than be ridden. *facepalm*

I did totally forget the shoulder angles. Would you say that the two are about the same in the shoulder?
     
    06-24-2013, 10:17 PM
  #4
Started
I think you have pegged both, pretty well. While I am no expert, I do think the first horse is slightly pigeon toed. His shoulder might be a bit more loaded than goes with the rest of him, but I'm not entire sure about that. The second horse certainly has either a hunter's bump or has a slightly roached back. I think also, he is a bit sickle-hocked.

Lizzie
     
    06-24-2013, 10:27 PM
  #5
Weanling
There's something about the second horse's back that I find a bit off, but I'm finding it difficult to pin-point... Does anyone else see a slight roach or something?
     
    06-24-2013, 10:43 PM
  #6
Started
What I'm seeing, is here....



Lizzie
     
    06-24-2013, 10:49 PM
  #7
Foal
Could it possibly be that he has a super flat croup? There's no definition to where his hip starts, his back just blends into his hindquarter with no change.

Now that I've stared at it for a while, I'm not sure. Maybe he just has a slight roach back? I don't think it's a hunter's bump though, those are further back and more noticeable.
     
    06-24-2013, 10:49 PM
  #8
Super Moderator
I will disagree about the first horse being both camped out behind and having mismatched pastern angles. He is standing with his legs too far behind him, due to being stood up that way. If you were to move his back legs forward to exactly the place where the canon bone (rear canon) was perfectly vertical, it would be in exact alingnment with the back edge of his hip bone (the back edge of his butt) . That would also move the pastern into an angle that perfectly mirrors the front. Other than his neck being set a tiny bit low for such a generous shoulder, I really like the first horse and think he'd be a wonderful all around mount.
     
    06-24-2013, 11:29 PM
  #9
Weanling
Quote:
Originally Posted by FeatheredFeet    
What I'm seeing, is here....



Lizzie
Yeah, that's where I was looking too. Any thoughts on that?
     
    06-25-2013, 12:47 AM
  #10
Showing
I feel that horse#2 has a VERY short back... where would the saddle go??

The first one's pasterns/cannon bones bother me for some reason..
     

Quick Reply
Please help keep the Horse Forum enjoyable by reporting rude posts.
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Horse Forum forums, you must first register.

Already have a Horse Forum account?
Members are allowed only one account per person at the Horse Forum, so if you've made an account here in the past you'll need to continue using that account. Please do not create a new account or you may lose access to the Horse Forum. If you need help recovering your existing account, please Contact Us. We'll be glad to help!

New to the Horse Forum?
Please choose a username you will be satisfied with using for the duration of your membership at the Horse Forum. We do not change members' usernames upon request because that would make it difficult for everyone to keep track of who is who on the forum. For that reason, please do not incorporate your horse's name into your username so that you are not stuck with a username related to a horse you may no longer have some day, or use any other username you may no longer identify with or care for in the future.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Old Thread Warning
This thread is more than 90 days old. When a thread is this old, it is often better to start a new thread rather than post to it. However, If you feel you have something of value to add to this particular thread, you can do so by checking the box below before submitting your post.

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Critique Me Riding Maverick Please? *read ALL of description before critique* Cheyennes mom Horse Riding Critique 10 03-24-2013 01:52 AM
Canter critique- first time critique, please be nice lol Rachel1786 Horse Riding Critique 11 12-05-2012 12:00 AM
Western Riding critique and confo critique on Romeo Pidge Horse Riding Critique 19 10-09-2012 03:21 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0