Heh. Another one for Diddly. - Page 3
   

       The Horse Forum > Horse Breeds, Breeding, and Genetics > Horse Conformation Critique

Heh. Another one for Diddly.

This is a discussion on Heh. Another one for Diddly. within the Horse Conformation Critique forums, part of the Horse Breeds, Breeding, and Genetics category

     
    LinkBack Thread Tools
        09-17-2013, 02:40 AM
      #21
    Yearling
    Ok......
    No comment.
    Anyone bar rhosroyalvelvet?

    Just posting this again:
    I heard light boned hovering around in this thread, can't remember who said it, but may I ask a question?
    Well Diddly has 8 eight inch bone (20.32 cm) and he is 16.1hh at the wither (high wither though) He is 3/4 TB, 1/4 Irish Draught. He is 15.3hh in the middle of his back.
    Would he be considered light boned then?
         
    Sponsored Links
    Advertisement
     
        09-17-2013, 03:31 PM
      #22
    Yearling
    Bump.
    Anyone? ONce my question is answered I'll let the thread sink away. :P
         
        09-17-2013, 10:44 PM
      #23
    Yearling
    Bone diameter to height is part of it, but also to me is bone diameter to the build. A slim built 16.2 hand grey-hound like TB can look more in proportion than a 14.3 hand super stocky and built like a tank QH with the same bone diameter. I would prefer for him to have more bone, but I don't consider him light boned, personally. Also in the long run, bone density is more important than diameter, however that can't be told by just looking at him.
         
        09-18-2013, 02:14 AM
      #24
    Yearling
    Okey Dokey! Thank you! :)
         
        09-19-2013, 03:44 PM
      #25
    Yearling
    Maybe this picture. All the good ones seem to be tiny for no apparent reason!
    Had to re size a little.




    Front leg.
         

    Thread Tools



    All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
    Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0