VET CHECK - Page 2

       The Horse Forum > Keeping and Caring for Horses > Horse Health


This is a discussion on VET CHECK within the Horse Health forums, part of the Keeping and Caring for Horses category

    YES I WOULD 32 88.89%
    NO 4 11.11%
    Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

    LinkBack Thread Tools
        05-10-2007, 01:17 AM
    I think horses health is very important. You never know I guess, I still think that you should get a vet check with the horse to be safe and sure. Like people say, it's better to be sure then sorry.
    Sponsored Links
        05-29-2007, 01:15 AM
    If im buying a cheap horse I genrally wont because I no for that price they are going to have things wrong with them and as long as they are rideable, young and keen I wont but with a ew of my more expensive horses (ie. $2000+) I have
        05-29-2007, 09:06 AM
    I would always vet check and would strongly recommend it, unless money is no object. My mother boarded a "free" horse someone gave her boarder who turned out to have advanced penis cancer and although he had a lovely place to die, it was nothing but bills. Vet checked hte horses we bought when I was a kid just to see f there were any issues we needed to manage.
    My vet checks have just allowed me to figure out what is going on and are not necessarily pass fail. I knew my paint's blue eyes would require extra management,he has some arthritis in his hocks, no problem. young(er) guy who is 7 was determined at his vet check to have "foot problems" we tooks pics and nerve blocked and finally determined he was "not exactly" a navicular horse but "there were some changes". It was determined that he would be fine for my purposes -trails as oppsed to roping, etc. I bought him andkept himin special shoes etc, rode him only on trails and NOW (3 years later) it seems he IS navicular, can be used for " very lght and occasional riding for the next 2-3 years, no mountians" (I live in montana). So, it appears I have a very expensive pasture ornament. If I had really paid attention and had grilled the vet a bit more and had not fallen in love with him BEFORE the check, I would not have bought him. But I love him now so he will likely just be out in his slippers...
        05-29-2007, 12:46 PM
    I had Wes vetted before I bought him, and I always will if I ever buy another. I just couldn't buy a horse to later find out it has something wrong with it that would prevent me from using it to the best of it's ability.
        12-02-2008, 03:26 PM
    I always have a vet check. My first horse seemed great until I found out through the vet check that he had pins and rods in his leg from an old fracture. Then again, he was OTTB so I had good reasons. That just taught me that no matter how sound and stable the horse seems I want to know for sure especially if I plan on doing something hard on their limbs.
        12-02-2008, 03:33 PM
    I did, and I always will. The first mare that I was going to buy ended up lame and really bad arthritis...which I didn't know about before I did the pre-purchase on her. Without a pre-purcahse I would have been the owner of a lame Paint mare....I definitely am thankful for the vet check.

    I also did a vet check on Sonny...he passed with flying colors.

    All the horses I buy, unless it's a young horse from someone I 100% completely trust, I'll do a vet check on. It saves money in the long run
        12-02-2008, 05:00 PM
    I didn't get a vet check on any of my horses.

    Looking back, we should have with Gem and Vega, but what's done is done.

    I was planning on getting a vet check on the 3rd horse we got, but I didn't expect to get him from someone my BO knew. Had it been anyone else, I would have gotten a vet check, just to make sure everything checks out.
    But like I said, I didn't with Montana because he came from someone highly recommended (by my friends and no I didn't get him at a dealer.. it was a private deal)
        12-02-2008, 05:12 PM
    I checked yes but in many cases I don't. I have a vet check for anything I buy over $3000 if its under I don't. And I rarely buy riding horses only breeding stock and my vet checks are for reproduction only.
        12-02-2008, 07:15 PM
    My first 2 horses were vet checked and given health certificates because they were come from across state lines. The third 1 I had vet checked to make sure he didn't have any health issues that were contagious. He had been abandon and hadn't had vet care in 2 years.
    Since any horse I get in the future will no doubt be from rescue situations I will always have them vet checked before I bring them home just so I don't have to worry about the ones at home getting sick.
        12-02-2008, 11:19 PM
    Of the four horses I have owned I've never done a pre-purchase vet check. My first pony I got when I was 11 for $50 and my parents didn't want to pay extra for a vet check . I got my QH gelding when I was 23 and I did kind of a reverse vet check lol...not when I bought him but right after just to make sure he had no issues we should address. I adopted my Mustang mare a year later and it would have been pretty difficult to have her vetted before I took her on as she was basically unhandled. And finally I was going to get a vet check for my Lily filly, but I saw her and just thought "this girl is for me"!! It worked out with all four luckily. I will say however that a vet check is probably a good idea especially for horses that have a lot of milage on them either because of age or what they've been used for and your planning on showing etc.

    Thread Tools

    All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:44 AM.

    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
    Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0