the Classic, Baroque, and Friesian Sporthorse - Page 2
 
 

       The Horse Forum > Riding Horses > Horse Riding Critique

the Classic, Baroque, and Friesian Sporthorse

This is a discussion on the Classic, Baroque, and Friesian Sporthorse within the Horse Riding Critique forums, part of the Riding Horses category
  • Friesian sport horse vs. baroque
  • Classic type friesians

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
    12-26-2008, 04:49 PM
  #11
Weanling
I personally like the sporthorse. I've ridden some baroque friesians and they have been total tanks. The sporthorses usually combine the athleticness and versatility of the throroughbred, making the sporthorse suitable for almost anything.
(however that pic of the sporthorse does nothing except make him look like he has a freakishly long neck)
Something like this...

Would be much better representative. This mare is 50%TB and 50% friesian
     
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
    12-26-2008, 06:32 PM
  #12
Foal
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyhuntress    
I personally like the sporthorse. I've ridden some baroque friesians and they have been total tanks. The sporthorses usually combine the athleticness and versatility of the throroughbred, making the sporthorse suitable for almost anything.
(however that pic of the sporthorse does nothing except make him look like he has a freakishly long neck)
Something like this...

Would be much better representative. This mare is 50%TB and 50% friesian
What Giiinger is posting isn't a cross, though. There is a Modern or Sport type recognized by the purebred registries now. They're bred lighter, and with a Warmblood way of moving for the showring. Depending on what you're discipline is, they usually have freakishly long, or "goosey" necks, especially for Saddleseat Friesians. Bleh.

If you're talking Part Bred, a horse can be any Friesian cross, not just a Thoroughbred. Arabian X Friesians are quite popular.

Personally, I *adore* the Baroque!! I own a Classic Friesian. I'm not a fan of the new Sport type, either. I don't mind them, but I don't approve of re-breeding the standard to suit your personal riding preference. It's selfish to me.

Also, most Friesians ride like a tank, or draft. They're harness horses bred for pulling or packing knights (knee action emphasized later for Royalty -- showy!!). Not riding. Hence the modern Sport type.
     
    12-26-2008, 06:55 PM
  #13
Weanling
Quote:
Originally Posted by MirrorStage2009    
What Giiinger is posting isn't a cross, though. There is a Modern or Sport type recognized by the purebred registries now. They're bred lighter, and with a Warmblood way of moving for the showring. Depending on what you're discipline is, they usually have freakishly long, or "goosey" necks, especially for Saddleseat Friesians. Bleh.

If you're talking Part Bred, a horse can be any Friesian cross, not just a Thoroughbred. Arabian X Friesians are quite popular.

Personally, I *adore* the Baroque!! I own a Classic Friesian. I'm not a fan of the new Sport type, either. I don't mind them, but I don't approve of re-breeding the standard to suit your personal riding preference. It's selfish to me.

Also, most Friesians ride like a tank, or draft. They're harness horses bred for pulling or packing knights (knee action emphasized later for Royalty -- showy!!). Not riding. Hence the modern Sport type.
awh, then maybe I misunderstood, because don't we have the Friesian Sport Horse Registry? (or at least I think we do, as that's what I was told a couple of the barn horses were) and it was created for horses that are anywhere from 25-100% friesian generally mixed with a lighter breed. They don't seem to be referred to as part breds anymore if they are registered,-even on show entries they are listed as Friesian Sporthorses- so that's probably why I got confused :)
Although I find it really interesting to know that there's saddleseat friesians. I can't even picture them!
     
    12-26-2008, 07:27 PM
  #14
Trained
Oooh. I like that cross...
That's the thing I didnt like about the picture of the sport horse. He looks like a giraffe =P
     
    12-26-2008, 07:40 PM
  #15
Showing
They are all gorgeous. I like the Baroque or the Classic!
     
    12-26-2008, 08:35 PM
  #16
Foal
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyhuntress    
awh, then maybe I misunderstood, because don't we have the Friesian Sport Horse Registry? (or at least I think we do, as that's what I was told a couple of the barn horses were) and it was created for horses that are anywhere from 25-100% friesian generally mixed with a lighter breed. They don't seem to be referred to as part breds anymore if they are registered,-even on show entries they are listed as Friesian Sporthorses- so that's probably why I got confused :)
Although I find it really interesting to know that there's saddleseat friesians. I can't even picture them!
Correct, the FSHR is for crossbred Friesians (or purebreds not allowed into the studbook, maybe? Idunno the cross registry rules? Although the German Friesian registry allows anything, usually, including crosses). Friesian Sporthorse is the name for anything with Friesian in it. In purebreds, it's just referring to a body type, the Modern or Sport, not really Sporthorse. Did that make sense?! I'm not good with words. Ack!
     
    12-26-2008, 09:15 PM
  #17
Started
I'm thinking this pic of Goffert might be a better representative of the modern (what they are calling sporthorse) type they were trying to illustrate. Not that the pic of the trotting horse isn't modern, but its either a mare or a very slender gelding compared to two stallions or late-cut geldings. A bit of an extreme comparison.

http://www.windspiritfriesians.com/images/Goffert.jpg
     
    12-26-2008, 09:30 PM
  #18
Weanling
Quote:
Originally Posted by MirrorStage2009    
Correct, the FSHR is for crossbred Friesians (or purebreds not allowed into the studbook, maybe? Idunno the cross registry rules? Although the German Friesian registry allows anything, usually, including crosses). Friesian Sporthorse is the name for anything with Friesian in it. In purebreds, it's just referring to a body type, the Modern or Sport, not really Sporthorse. Did that make sense?! I'm not good with words. Ack!
I think I get it. Its more like if its an actual cross, it can be called a friesian sporthorse, but if we are looking right among the actual purebred friesians, the sporthorse would be a type, right?


Sara- I love goffert. I saw him do a grand prix special in las vegas and it was breathtaking :)
     
    12-26-2008, 10:01 PM
  #19
Foal
I prefer the sporthorse. Longer, more fluidity. I am sucker of flowy horses (:
     
    12-26-2008, 10:26 PM
  #20
Foal
Adding on...

Mirrorstage2009-

I know little about Friesian registry and breeding of the particular, but I understand what you are saying about purebreds' body type (sport) as a term.

Cross bred Friesians (sport horse) are supposed to have the qualities of a sport horse built on the qualities of a Friesian.

I think that the term "Friesian Sport Horse" is specific to a Friesian bred with a sport horse (lighter breed).
Correct me if I am wrong.

Like I said I prefer the sporthorse. Longer, more fluidity. But I am probably biased because I like lighter horses. All three body types are stunning, though.
     

Quick Reply
Please help keep the Horse Forum enjoyable by reporting rude posts.
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Horse Forum forums, you must first register.

Already have a Horse Forum account?
Members are allowed only one account per person at the Horse Forum, so if you've made an account here in the past you'll need to continue using that account. Please do not create a new account or you may lose access to the Horse Forum. If you need help recovering your existing account, please Contact Us. We'll be glad to help!

New to the Horse Forum?
Please choose a username you will be satisfied with using for the duration of your membership at the Horse Forum. We do not change members' usernames upon request because that would make it difficult for everyone to keep track of who is who on the forum. For that reason, please do not incorporate your horse's name into your username so that you are not stuck with a username related to a horse you may no longer have some day, or use any other username you may no longer identify with or care for in the future.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Old Thread Warning
This thread is more than 90 days old. When a thread is this old, it is often better to start a new thread rather than post to it. However, If you feel you have something of value to add to this particular thread, you can do so by checking the box below before submitting your post.

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Little Appy sporthorse Velvet Horse Pictures 13 12-13-2008 08:15 PM
Baroque Horses MirrorStage2009 Horse Breeds 10 10-20-2008 12:51 PM
Flying Friesian MirrorStage2009 Horse Pictures 10 10-17-2008 10:54 PM
He doesn't look like a Friesian **LOL** ImperiousImpression Horse Breeds 18 09-20-2008 07:23 PM
Sporthorse broodmare prospect - any opinions? Painted1 Horse Riding Critique 1 10-01-2007 02:55 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0