What do you think of this horse's confo?
 
 

       The Horse Forum > Riding Horses > Horse Riding Critique

What do you think of this horse's confo?

This is a discussion on What do you think of this horse's confo? within the Horse Riding Critique forums, part of the Riding Horses category
  • Old ink horse pics
  • Sickle hocked reining horse

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
    08-17-2011, 08:56 PM
  #1
Green Broke
What do you think of this horse's confo?

This is Rodeo's full brother Higher Time. He was 2 years old, and 15hh at the time of these pictures. What do you think of his conformation? Does Rodeo seem to have similar confo to him

Higher Time....





And here is Rodeo at 15months old in these pics...



Please not that Rodeo was standing like a goof in these pics, so I know their not good to critique on. As far the comparing the two, which do you think has better confo, from what you can see? Do you think Rodeo will have the same confo at 2years of age?

Thanks!!!
     
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
    08-17-2011, 09:12 PM
  #2
Trained
1st colt is sickle hocked which predisposes him to lameness if used too demandingly. He toes out at the back as well. Be careful when you break him out & use him, no overloading. He has a nice shoulder & rear. Overall condition is very nice. 2nd boy has high knees both front & back, & is over at the knee on the front. Nice overall for a young boy. I like 1st horse better, but I think the 2nd horse might be a bit stronger structurally, but I am no expert. I try to avoid sickle hocks, every horse I have seen with them gets some sort of lameness.
     
    08-17-2011, 09:46 PM
  #3
Green Broke
Thanks for the critique waresbear!! I had the opportunity to buy one or the other at the time I was buying. I loved the overo(second one), but I also liked the 1st one. One reason or another, I bought the overo.

I agree with you about the confo critique though! My horse, definitely is over at the knee. The first horse, almost appears more "dainty" to me now that I really look at the pictures next to each other.

Last I knew of his brother he was bought by a man living somewhere in NY. I was told that they were going to use him for eventing, I believe.

Overall though, you think the second one would be more structurally sound?
     
    08-18-2011, 12:51 AM
  #4
Ink
Weanling
Let's see. Horse 1 had a nice slope to his shoulder, and overall is nicely balanced with good muscle tone. He has a nice long neck, but his throat latch is a little on the thick side. He does have a few structural problems, aside from being built down hill (which he'll mostly likely grow out of considering he's two). As waresbear pointed out he is sickle hocked, which really isn't uncommon in the stock horse breeds (I'm assuming these are paint/quarter horses) and can actually be desirable to an extent for certain disciplines such as reining. He's also over at the knee and toes out in the back.

Horse 2 has a slightly steeper shoulder than horse 1 which will probably cause him to have a little bit rougher stride but nothing too extreme (we're talking maybe 5 degrees difference). Colt 2 is also pretty well balanced although he has a little less substance to his hind quarters. Though, that could very well be because he's younger; he'll probably fill out more as he gets older. His neck ties into his shoulder lower than horse 1, but this isn't necessarily a bad thing especially if you plan on using him as western pleasure horse as he'll be naturally inclined to carry himself with a nice level topline! Your colt definitely has horse 1 beat structurally speaking. He is also built slightly down hill, but to much less extent than horse one. With him being younger he should level out just fine which will make him lighter on the front end and therefore more maneuverable when you start riding him. He is also a teeny bit over at the knee, but again not nearly as noticeably as the first horse. It's kind of hard to tell what his back legs look like from these pictures. He looks almost post legged in the bottom one but I'm guessing that's just a combination of the angle and the way he's standing.

All in all I think you made a good choice. I think your colt will be easier to keep sound and he's pretty colors to boot! What are your plans for him?
     
    08-18-2011, 09:45 AM
  #5
Green Broke
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ink    
Let's see. Horse 1 had a nice slope to his shoulder, and overall is nicely balanced with good muscle tone. He has a nice long neck, but his throat latch is a little on the thick side. He does have a few structural problems, aside from being built down hill (which he'll mostly likely grow out of considering he's two). As waresbear pointed out he is sickle hocked, which really isn't uncommon in the stock horse breeds (I'm assuming these are paint/quarter horses) and can actually be desirable to an extent for certain disciplines such as reining. He's also over at the knee and toes out in the back.

Horse 2 has a slightly steeper shoulder than horse 1 which will probably cause him to have a little bit rougher stride but nothing too extreme (we're talking maybe 5 degrees difference). Colt 2 is also pretty well balanced although he has a little less substance to his hind quarters. Though, that could very well be because he's younger; he'll probably fill out more as he gets older. His neck ties into his shoulder lower than horse 1, but this isn't necessarily a bad thing especially if you plan on using him as western pleasure horse as he'll be naturally inclined to carry himself with a nice level topline! Your colt definitely has horse 1 beat structurally speaking. He is also built slightly down hill, but to much less extent than horse one. With him being younger he should level out just fine which will make him lighter on the front end and therefore more maneuverable when you start riding him. He is also a teeny bit over at the knee, but again not nearly as noticeably as the first horse. It's kind of hard to tell what his back legs look like from these pictures. He looks almost post legged in the bottom one but I'm guessing that's just a combination of the angle and the way he's standing.

All in all I think you made a good choice. I think your colt will be easier to keep sound and he's pretty colors to boot! What are your plans for him?

Thanks for the critique Ink!!! They are actually 1/2Paint 1/2TBs...there is really more TB to their lines than anything....here is Rodeo's pedigree, which is the same as horse #1 b/c they are full brothers....Rodeo Time Paint

I agree with everything you said. Horse #2 is over at the knee. He isnt sickle hocked like horse #1 though, but he is very posty in the back. I've already started to stretch him, hoping that it will loosen him up, and keep him a little more flexible. Here is a back shot of Horse #2

IMO, he seems to be straighter. Occasionally when he is standing he is toed out, but seems to walk with his feet facing the correct direction.

Again, thank you so much for commenting and telling me the differences! I really appreciate it!!!
     
    08-18-2011, 10:40 AM
  #6
Green Broke
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ink    
What are your plans for him?
Hah, sorry just saw this....my plans for him are just about everything. I want to use him for anything and everything that I get into whether that's barrels, jumping, dressage, eventing, ect, ect. IM not talking about high levels or anything, just lower level stuff :). He's also going to be my trail horse.

I don't know, so basically Versatility...from his temperament, he is very willing to do just about anything
     
    08-18-2011, 02:21 PM
  #7
Green Broke
Anyone else have any thoughts on the two?
     

Quick Reply
Please help keep the Horse Forum enjoyable by reporting rude posts.
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Horse Forum forums, you must first register.

Already have a Horse Forum account?
Members are allowed only one account per person at the Horse Forum, so if you've made an account here in the past you'll need to continue using that account. Please do not create a new account or you may lose access to the Horse Forum. If you need help recovering your existing account, please Contact Us. We'll be glad to help!

New to the Horse Forum?
Please choose a username you will be satisfied with using for the duration of your membership at the Horse Forum. We do not change members' usernames upon request because that would make it difficult for everyone to keep track of who is who on the forum. For that reason, please do not incorporate your horse's name into your username so that you are not stuck with a username related to a horse you may no longer have some day, or use any other username you may no longer identify with or care for in the future.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Old Thread Warning
This thread is more than 90 days old. When a thread is this old, it is often better to start a new thread rather than post to it. However, If you feel you have something of value to add to this particular thread, you can do so by checking the box below before submitting your post.

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help with Horse's eye Saddlehorse1978 Horse Health 26 07-26-2011 04:34 AM
Confo questions/confo lesson for me Fowl Play Horse Riding Critique 5 04-21-2011 01:34 PM
Critique My Riding PLUS My horse's confo. KcFinancialBurn Horse Riding Critique 18 08-31-2010 09:36 AM
Confo Critique - I finally got soome confo pics...I think Cinnys Whinny Horse Riding Critique 8 05-15-2010 09:03 PM
Your Horse's Name(s) o0hawaiigirl0o Horse Talk 30 09-18-2008 06:19 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0