11-14-2009, 05:34 PM
|
#11 | Yearling
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Watertown, MN
Posts: 1,156
| Sorry, but I really disagree. I've ridden several horses exclusively bareback for a 5-6 year period in my teens. Often for 3-5 hours a day and I don't have a "bubbly" butt. I've never seen any sort of problem associated with it. Either has my friend who has the most non-existent butt ever! LOL, poor girl.  And she rides almost exclusively bareback 2-3 hours every day. Anyways as I said before, if you ride properly and well-balanced I've never seen any ill effects even on horses that are ridden exclusively and hard bareback. |
| |
11-14-2009, 06:48 PM
|
#12 | Started
Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Poplar Bluff, Missouri
Posts: 1,834
| I'm glad you have had such luck. Don't say you are sorry, controversy makes the world go round after all. I was simply stating my opinion and reasoning. Im not sure the article but i do remember it was from a Western Horseman a few years ago, where they took heat and stress readings on the same horse being ridden both bareback and under saddle.And from that test and others they determined that it does in fact create a more acute stress pattern on the spine when an animal is riden bareback. I am going off of what i read. though for the sake of argument i might add that just because there are no strong signs of damage, it might still be rather uncomfortable to animal.... Just my take on it, yours is just as good. |
| |
11-14-2009, 06:55 PM
|
#13 | Green Broke
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Montana
Posts: 3,787
| also to take into consideration is that many people who are normally okay in a saddle, will lose stability when you take it all away from them which I think may contribute to what you read.
Certainly though, there are some horses I would never want to ride bareback because it just -seems- uncomfortable for the horse and I know it would be uncomfortable for me! Don't know how much validity there is to the first part of that though |
| |
11-14-2009, 08:04 PM
|
#14 | Started
Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 2,203
| It may not make your particular horse sore enough that you notice but it puts your wieght on a much smaller area than if you were to use a saddle. If you are riding bareback thinking that it is more comfortable for your horse you are wrong. If you are doing it because you enjoy it or it impoves your seat then go ahead but know that it is less comfortable for your horse. |
| |
11-14-2009, 10:07 PM
|
#15 | Weanling
Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Northwestern, WA
Posts: 300
| My horse had really severe back problems for a while when I got her because the saddle her previous owner used didn't fit well. I rode barback for almost two years until I found a saddle that actually fit (she's VERY wide), and Sugar was absolutely fine the whole time. I've never experienced a horse being in pain from bareback riding. I think it's actually probably more comfortable for the horse, because a saddle is stiff and doesn't move with the contours of a horse's back, whereas your body does. |
| |
11-14-2009, 10:11 PM
|
#16 | Weanling
Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Northwestern, WA
Posts: 300
| But then again, maybe it's just a difference between stress on the soft tissue, and stress on the bone. Either way, it's the same amount of weight, and I'm guessing nothing but a good, balanced rider can improve either situation for the horse. |
| |
11-14-2009, 10:30 PM
|
#17 | Weanling
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Florida, GA line
Posts: 659
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MN Tigerstripes I've never had a horse have a problem with it... But I would think if you're off balance and really bouncing around it could be painful. | I agree,my horses enjoy it because they feel "free" and 25 pounds lighter. |
| |
11-14-2009, 10:35 PM
|
#18 | Yearling
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Watertown, MN
Posts: 1,156
| Of course, I don't have any evidence to back it up, so I could just have really stoic (sp) horses. Well, not Soda, it was a pain finding a saddle that he did like. And of course now I'm hearing terrible things about treeless saddles...
I've noticed that it's a lot harder to fit an western saddle than an english too. Pain in the butt. |
| |
11-14-2009, 10:39 PM
|
#19 | Weanling
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Florida, GA line
Posts: 659
| I think bb pads are good to use but NOT with stirrups.I think that is defeating the purpose of riding bareback and not to mention dangerous to you and the horse because they have no tree. |
| |
11-15-2009, 12:43 PM
|
#20 | Weanling
Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Northwestern, WA
Posts: 300
| lacyloo- I agree. Weight in the stirrups on bb pads put all your weight in one spot. Ouch. Plus if you're going to have stirrups, why not just use a saddle? |
| | | |