All purpose vs close contact?
 
 

       The Horse Forum > Horse Tack > Horse Tack and Equipment

All purpose vs close contact?

This is a discussion on All purpose vs close contact? within the Horse Tack and Equipment forums, part of the Horse Tack category
  • Close contact saddle v. all purpose saddle
  • All purpose vs close contact saddles

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
    12-25-2010, 07:00 PM
  #1
Weanling
All purpose vs close contact?

I'm looking around at getting a new saddle..or rather saving up for a new really nice saddle that fits my horse like a glove..
I'm saddle-tarded basically. My current saddle is just a cheap synthetic Riviera Pro Am all purpose saddle.
I'm somewhat confused when it comes to all purpose vs close contact..what's a close contact for?
I ride english pleasure w/t/c with some jumping, more in the future..which do you think I should get all purpose or close contact?
Thanks
     
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
    12-25-2010, 07:23 PM
  #2
Weanling
As far as I know, close contact saddles are more geared towards jumping.

Some say AP saddles are NO purpose saddles, because they are not particularly suited for any discipline.
     
    12-25-2010, 07:38 PM
  #3
Trained
All Purpose saddles = No Purpose Saddles. They are designed to allow the rider to beable to do any discipline with 1 saddle, but in reality it does not aid the rider at all.

Close Contact Saddles stirrup bars are placed in a forward position to allow the rider to obtain a proper jumping position while in tack, to aid the rider to ride the fences as functionally as they can. The seats of CC's arent as deep either, to aid the rider to obtain a lighter seat, to beable to functionally ride in a 2 point position.

They are, designed for Jumping.

Dressage Saddles, the stirrup bars are placed farther back, to allow the rider to obtain a straiter leg to be functional for the movements desired for the sport. The seats are deeper to allow the rider to beable to sit deeper and to allow the rider to remain at the verticle, balanced over their horses center of gravity. They are, designed for Dressage.

The All Purpose, has a mixture of everything. The Stirrup Bars are placed in the middle - not forward and not back - but right in the middle. Where they do not aid the rider to obtain a proper leg for jumping, nor a proper leg for dressage.

All Purpose saddles are "ok" for beginner riders and riders who do pleasure, and trail riding, and small fences, but if you are advancing to do jumping seriously, I would suggest you invest in a CC.
     
    12-25-2010, 08:25 PM
  #4
Green Broke
A good AP is better forflat work and small jumps. If you're going to be jumping higher than 2', then a good close contact or jumping saddle may be better for you.

I have a fleet of AP saddles for my lesson program, all good brands (4 Stubbens, a wintec, and an Avante). They are great to learn in as they are more secure, but they're not great for jumping more than small jumps in. Any of my students interested in jumping higher are encouraged to get their own flatter jumping saddle.

My daughter wants to even, so I'm ordering her a Thorowgood AP Broadback (Cob). It has a shallower close contact seat and a square cantle, more like halfway between an AP and a CC. It's a very cool saddle, though most appropriate for wider horses with low withers.
     
    12-25-2010, 08:46 PM
  #5
Weanling
Awesome! Thank you for all the replies! I'll be getting a cc saddle then! Thanks so much.
Posted via Mobile Device
     
    12-26-2010, 07:51 PM
  #6
Started
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIEventer    
All Purpose saddles = No Purpose Saddles.
On the contrary: AP's are the perfect saddle for more than half the riders out there. The reason being, more than half of the riders out there don't do either dressage or jumping at high levels.

I did first level dressage and jumped up to 3' (on a 13.2H pony) in an AP - it was what I was given, so I never knew any different. I know 2 low-level eventers who only have AP saddles - If they'd had to buy two different saddles they couldn't afford to do the sport.

Like you're always pointing out, even jumpers should still do dressage... So if a rider can only afford one saddle it should be an AP, not a CC.
     
    12-26-2010, 08:10 PM
  #7
Green Broke
I really hate tha ap=np statement. A GOOD AP saddle is well balanced for flat work and jumping. I agree that you can't jump high in them (IMO 2' or less is best) and they're not always suitable for showing H/J (or English Pleasure), but they are good saddles to learn in. That's why all I have are AP saddles in my lesson program, and one VSD AP.

Yes, you do need to work a little harder to keep your position with long stirrups in Dressage work, but I feel that's a good thing. It strengthens the rider's muscles and muscle memory. For jumping, an AP saddle is great as you won't fall out if you get left behind or have some other awkward jump. I like the stirrup bars as they are not too far forward. I see more chair seats in the hunter ring around here than anything else. Your heel should STILL be under your rear, even with short stirrups and even over fences. Keeping your leg back makes it easier to go in to a 2-point or half seat and stay balanced, so you don't have to throw yourself forward or stick your butt way out.

So, IMO, learning jumping is easier in an AP than a CC. However, if a rider wants to show or is past the basics and jumping 2' or higher in lessons, then a CC or jump saddle is the way to go.
     
    12-26-2010, 08:50 PM
  #8
Trained
Maybe. To each their own, if A/P's work for you, than great - so be it. But I think they are an unhappy inbetween. They don't aid the rider what-so-ever *depending on discipline*

I used to ride in a Wintec 500 A/P and I loved it. I swore up and down everytime I heard A/P's = N/P's, and said that was incorrect. I was able to do dressage just fine, and I was able to jump just fine in mine, and I was quite adamant on that...until I got a coach who actually made me work, and made me focus on my position.

When it came time to actually get my leg under me, and me to balance over my feet - I couldn't do it. It physically hurt hurt when I tried. I had no idea. Whenever my Coach tried to get me to get up into a functional two point, I couldn't do it without losing my balance - I physically tried over and over over and over, and blamed myself for the incorrectness, to find out it was the saddle.

Now, I have a CC, and that saddle HELPS me get into the proper position, without struggle and without physical pain. Because it is designed for it.

Your saddle is supposed to aid you, not hinder you. I've ridden in a few A/P's - and I found the same result - the struggle to get my position, and my leg under me and to stay out of my tack - could be how I am built maybe, but I hear from a lot of people the same story about A/P's.
     
    12-26-2010, 09:15 PM
  #9
Green Broke
MIE just curious...what would you call my saddle...the Collegiate Convertible Senior Event?

It almost reminds me of a cross between AP and CC...I would love a true CC but...well...you know my unfortunate troubles with them :/
Posted via Mobile Device
     
    12-26-2010, 09:28 PM
  #10
Trained
I know you have a hard time - have you looked into a saddle like this:

Albion Saddlemakers

Your saddle, the Collegiate Convertible Event, is an A/P. The flaps are not forward enough for bigger fences, but it is a saddle that works for you. If it works for you, then that's great. But I do think you will find problems with your position and your knee's when you start jumping bigger fences. Your knees will surpass the flaps when you shorten your leathers to accomodate bigger fences.
     

Quick Reply
Please help keep the Horse Forum enjoyable by reporting rude posts.
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Horse Forum forums, you must first register.

Already have a Horse Forum account?
Members are allowed only one account per person at the Horse Forum, so if you've made an account here in the past you'll need to continue using that account. Please do not create a new account or you may lose access to the Horse Forum. If you need help recovering your existing account, please Contact Us. We'll be glad to help!

New to the Horse Forum?
Please choose a username you will be satisfied with using for the duration of your membership at the Horse Forum. We do not change members' usernames upon request because that would make it difficult for everyone to keep track of who is who on the forum. For that reason, please do not incorporate your horse's name into your username so that you are not stuck with a username related to a horse you may no longer have some day, or use any other username you may no longer identify with or care for in the future.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Old Thread Warning
This thread is more than 90 days old. When a thread is this old, it is often better to start a new thread rather than post to it. However, If you feel you have something of value to add to this particular thread, you can do so by checking the box below before submitting your post.

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crosby Close Contact. $250 OBO-US Carpenoctumstable Tack and Equipment Classifieds 2 04-26-2010 01:41 PM
Close contact vs. All purpose is there a difference? Maremeiana Horse Tack and Equipment 2 06-21-2009 05:18 PM
Which Close Contact Saddle? blossom856 Horse Tack and Equipment 12 01-07-2009 09:48 PM
All Purpose or Close Contact appylover31803 Horse Tack and Equipment 3 10-25-2008 11:47 PM
All purpose or close contact?! elliebabe17 Horse Tack and Equipment 4 09-01-2008 03:14 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0