Anybody here about the abuse case conserning Sharon Jeffco on judge judy/
There is NO way that the owner did this to her own horse. If you go back and watch JJ and listen carefully, the owner stated that she tried to stop the trainer. She was yelling at her to stop and I believe it wasn't until the owner of the horse headed down the stairs, into the arena to stop it did the trainer stop and then said "OOPS GOT BLOOD". I've read many of these post that say that she should have hurt the trainer. I ask you, if you went into the arena and saw your horses mouth bleeding perfusley, would you concentrate on your horse and the injury or would you say, the horse can wait, first I'm going to kick this B...H's butt and then I will worry about my horse. Come on and think about what you are saying. The owner did the right thing by concidering her horses injury first. If she would have kicked the trainer's butt, she would have been thrown in jail that night, then what would have happened to her horse. She certainly wouldn't have be taken care of. The trainer even lied on her web site as to how long she had the horse. She got the horse in February, this happened March 31, 2010. I've done some checking with this so called trainer and she does not allow anybody to ride their horses without her being there. The owner stated that she wanted to be there for all of her horses training to make sure that the horse was being rode. This trainer makes you pay $600.00 in advance before she will touch your horse. She is the first trainer that has ever charged before the work was done. No wonder the owner wanted to be there. Go back to her web site with pen and paper and see if you can't find all of the inconsistancies in her story that I did. It's very easy to do. I wonder since she has implied that her horse was poisoned by barbituates found through an autopsy(autopsy's are done on humans only-if she is all that she claims to be, don't you think she would know that? Necropsy's are done on horses, not autopsy's) don't you think she would have posted that finding? And then she claims yet another horse was found dead, and again, NOTHING to support her claim. I find that to be suspicious, don't you. And to the person who left her horses with the owner of the horse, it sounds like you abonded your horses when you left OK to live in another state. Do you really think that any border would give you your horses until your bill was paid in full, I think not. Face it, you abandoned your horses and to make yourself feel better about it, to ease your guilt of abandoning them, you are going to fault her because she wants her boarding fees. Get real.
Last edited by TrustinGod; 02-20-2012 at 11:35 AM.
Reason: wrong word.