Horse Slaughter: For or Against it? - Page 2
 
 

       The Horse Forum > Keeping and Caring for Horses > Horse Talk

Horse Slaughter: For or Against it?

This is a discussion on Horse Slaughter: For or Against it? within the Horse Talk forums, part of the Keeping and Caring for Horses category
  • Industrialized horse slaughter
  • Industrialized slaughter -"every twelve seconds"

Like Tree9Likes

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
    11-13-2011, 07:10 PM
  #11
Trained
For it. Too many unwanted ones being shipped to Mexico facing a far more stressful end than if it were done in the US. If it could go hand in hand with more responsible breeding, that would be nice.
     
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
    11-13-2011, 07:32 PM
  #12
Started
Yes it does Spirit11.

I'm not against people eating horses, but I am against industrialized slaughter for the following reasons:

1. There is simply no humane way to do it in an industrialized setting. Horses kick each other in close quarters, they panic blindly, and they can avoid the bolt much easier than a cow because of their longer necks. I have no problem with people shooting their horses at home because that way the horse (usually) doesn't see it coming. There is no possible way to send a horse to a slaughter plant without them seeing it coming.

2. The "out of sight, out of mind" problem. What slaughter does is free up space for careless breeders to create more horses. If they couldn't just send their unwanted horses off in a truck, they would eventually run out of space and have to stop breeding (or start shooting). My mom doesn't care about the environment at all, but when the city talked about reducing her garbage collection to every two weeks, she immediately started talking about ways to reduce garbage. Same principle with unwanted horses. When people can just make their garbage magically disappear, they don't think twice about creating more.

3. The entire "horses were better taken care of when there was slaughter" argument just doesn't fly. First, the US does still have slaughter - the only difference is that horses travel a longer distance to get there. Second, kill buyers do not pay well for starving horses. The horses you see starving now got that way because of the economy, not the slaughter ban. Those horses belong to people who can't afford them anymore but don't want to send them to slaughter. If the owners of those horses were fine with sending them to slaughter, they would have done so while the horses still had meat on them.
MandiMal likes this.
     
    11-13-2011, 07:43 PM
  #13
Showing
This subject has been exhausted on every horse web site on the internet. Discussing it here does nothing to change the situation. The politicians need to be addressed en mass in order for change to happen. The slaughter houses are necessary but how the animals are transported can be changed, and how they are treated once they arrive at the plant. If we don't have slaughter houses horses and other livestock will be turned loose to fend. God help the person who comes aroun a bend at night and hits one. There are too many moose collisions, we don't need to add horses to this.
     
    11-13-2011, 07:44 PM
  #14
Yearling
I'm for it 100 percent.

I agree with you, Ponyboy, that there are some who used the slaughter industry to "free up space", but would disagree that the starving horses are due to economy and not the slaughter ban.

Maybe in some areas meat auctions are alive and well, but at the last auction I went to (middle Colorado), I watched 4 or 5 full weight horses go through and not even get a 20.00 bid - back in the day they would have gone for 500 easy. We are simply too far away for a meat hauler to drive here and then to a border. So these horses went back with their original owners, who will most probably turn them out for the winter on a 200 acre high desert pasture with no shelter (not even trees), little water, and nothing in the fields that will sustain them. And they will starve.

There are always horses that have lived out their usefulness, and in a perfect world their owners would reward them with retirement. But horses are expensive if treated well, and not many owners can afford to keep retirees 1 and 2 while financing the show career of 3. A humane death is best, but slaughter avoids the prolonged and painful deaths that the chronically sick, lame, or dangerous horses certainly face now.
     
    11-13-2011, 08:23 PM
  #15
Weanling
I am for it. I think there are ways to make it less brutal, though to call it "humane" may always be a bit of a stretch on the word. No matter how few horses are bred, there will ALWAYS be horses that their best purpose in this world is meat. Culls on the grounds of confirmation, temperament or genetic defect need to have a reasonable route for disposal, for lack of a better term.

I would also like to see breeders hold themselves to a higher standard and failing that, have a standard enforced somehow. I think that without a decent show record from a recognized association, be it breed association or show association like USDF, a horse should be permitted to reproduce. It does not matter what size the operation is, there are out and out too many "no purpose" horses being produced and that is where the issues of overpopulation stem from. There will be horses that are not up the standards of their stellar parents to fill the niche of back yard pet, school horse, or companion.
     
    11-13-2011, 11:42 PM
  #16
Yearling
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spirit11    
I heard of a practice of breeding a broodmare at the same time that you breed a show horse, race horse, whatever. When the babies are born you can take the baby away from the broodmare and give her the show horse's baby to raise. That way the show horse isn't out of commission for so long. The babies of the broodmares are then disposed of, sold, or send to auction. Does this actually happen/still happen?

I have never hear of this happening (that doesn't mean that it no longer happens). But, in my experience, if a breeder wants to breed their show horse and keep it showing they'll just do in-vitro and use a surrogate mare. That way they can cancle out the possibility of losing the mare really at all during pregnancy and the mare can continue showing. Thus, increasing the value of the mare and future foal (if the mare is successful).
     
    11-14-2011, 12:05 AM
  #17
Started
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spirit11    
Animals are not disposable.
Perhaps, but they are edible. Just about any animal is considered dinner somewhere in the world. Horses are not exempt from that fact.

Quote:
Originally Posted by equiniphile    
You don't have to be a nag, you just have to be unlucky.
Sadly true- many nice, well trained saddle horses show up at auction, and not all of them wind up in new loving homes that will pamper them for the rest of their lives.

If horses are going to be killed, or rather, when all those horses are killed, I'd rather it be done without shipping them for days to get to their final destination. Unfortunately it's also cheaper to just feed a horse for another month than to get a vet out to euthanize and dispose of a horse too. It's a crappy situation all around.
     
    11-14-2011, 08:38 AM
  #18
Yearling
Backyard breeders and big time show breeders are to blame for over producing, combined with the economy and here we are. It's sad any way you look at it. Is slaughter the answer to excessive/ignorant breeding?
     
    11-14-2011, 10:23 AM
  #19
Yearling
Here's my thought...at a minimum:
It is evident that there will always be an excess of population in domesticated animals as long as human beings remain a factor in their breeding.

At least in horse slaughter they can be used for meat or other products, and their deaths are not in entirety a waste.

We don't get that from the piles of cats and dogs euthanized daily due to human selfishness.
     
    11-14-2011, 10:54 AM
  #20
Green Broke
I must say, where I live, in the entire country, there are a maximum of 3 slaughter houses for horses, and they are almost never used, which I think is a wonderful thing.

However, I am very much for it. While I would rather that every horse on this planet lives out their days in a lush meadow with lots of love, I know that it simply isn't a reality. I would much rather these horses who, to put it bluntly, "have no use anymore" were killed quickly and without suffering, than to waste away in an abandoned stall until they die. When they are slaughtered, their bodies can be used for many things, which is very helpful.

Conditions in most slaughterhouses are not what people think. The horses in most of them are actually very well cared for until it's their time, and I'm sure that the horses themselves would rather it be quick and painless like it is in a slaughterhouse, where I believe the workers do their best to keep the animal from suffering.
     

Quick Reply
Please help keep the Horse Forum enjoyable by reporting rude posts.
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Horse Forum forums, you must first register.

Already have a Horse Forum account?
Members are allowed only one account per person at the Horse Forum, so if you've made an account here in the past you'll need to continue using that account. Please do not create a new account or you may lose access to the Horse Forum. If you need help recovering your existing account, please Contact Us. We'll be glad to help!

New to the Horse Forum?
Please choose a username you will be satisfied with using for the duration of your membership at the Horse Forum. We do not change members' usernames upon request because that would make it difficult for everyone to keep track of who is who on the forum. For that reason, please do not incorporate your horse's name into your username so that you are not stuck with a username related to a horse you may no longer have some day, or use any other username you may no longer identify with or care for in the future.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Old Thread Warning
This thread is more than 90 days old. When a thread is this old, it is often better to start a new thread rather than post to it. However, If you feel you have something of value to add to this particular thread, you can do so by checking the box below before submitting your post.

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Horse Slaughter Michael Horse Protection 6 05-26-2011 04:33 PM
And you think horse slaughter is bad... MacabreMikolaj Horse Protection 90 11-24-2010 05:00 PM
Horse slaughter..?? ShadowSpazzz Horse Health 34 08-19-2010 10:07 PM
Horse Slaughter PechosGoldenChance Horse Protection 79 05-23-2010 01:24 AM
HELP! new horse from slaughter MeganMafia Horse Health 7 06-16-2009 07:20 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0