Right of First Refusal - Page 3 - The Horse Forum
 44Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #21 of 63 Old 02-18-2013, 05:59 PM
Trained
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,283
• Horses: 1
I have my horse because of "right of first refusal"- his previous owner had to sell him due to divorce and offered him first to the breeder from whom she had bought him. The breeder has a "right of first refusal" clause in the bill of sale he gave me, too, but to be honest I'd call up the previous owner first; I exchanged a few e-mails with her around the time that I bought him and it was very clear to me that she was heartbroken that he had been sold and she no longer had the opportunity to eventually buy him back again. That, and I wasn't impressed with the condition he was in when I bought him (underweight even though he's an EASY keeper, poorly maintained feet, etc.)
verona1016 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #22 of 63 Old 02-18-2013, 06:46 PM Thread Starter
Weanling
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 687
• Horses: 0
I can understand using the right of first refusal to prevent the horse from.ending up in slaughter if someone knows if all else fails, they can get x amount of money back. And I would be fine with it if it ended there. I don't like people checking up on me and driving by the house. Call me paranoid, but I live in the country so I don't have to deal with people, including nosy neighbors. But that's kind of off topic.

My issue starts when people think they have the right to the horse at any/all time and should get it back in the amount of their choice. I'm happy to send updates for a little while so they know their horse has settled, and that's just because I'm a decent person, and once those hooves are on my property, anything I inform the previous person about is out of the goodness of my heart. I don't lease or adopt horses because I don't like being told what I can and can't do with them. But by some of your descriptions, it seems the people I have passed over weren't using the clause properly. If all they wanted was first option to purchase the horse at whatever price I set it at, sure. No need for drama and hurt feelings because I didn't keep a horse forever. In this day and age, people should be happy to know that a horse had a great, spoiled life while it was with me, however long that might be, whether it is is a month or 10 years.
Posted via Mobile Device
Speed Racer, AlexS and doubleopi like this.
Nightside is offline  
post #23 of 63 Old 02-18-2013, 08:43 PM
Yearling
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Southern Cali
Posts: 933
• Horses: 1
I've always thought about it as a courtesy thing. When I sold my father's older gelding (20 years old, we had him for 6 years) I asked that if something came up that they might consider notifying me. I didn't require it and didn't even mention it in our contract (they leased him first), but let them know that the horse meant a lot to me.

Ends up two years later that the family was relocating out of the states and gave me a call and offered him back to me for free. Very sadly I was unable the support two horses at the time and wished him luck with rehoming him.

I think its a nice thing to do, but never should be necessary.


Want to know the story? From The Start? It is a work in progress.
The $25 horse I didn't want.
Horsesdontlie is offline  
post #24 of 63 Old 02-18-2013, 10:40 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bronson, Florida
Posts: 725
• Horses: 1
Both the horses we have recently bought have a "First right of Refusal" clause. It's a simple one liner that merely states that should we for whatever reason decided to sell said horse, the folks we bought them from get first chance to buy them back at whatever price we are asking.

I'll honor that. I see no reason not to, really. They aren't up in our business and made no demands. Course, if they had, we wouldn't have bought the horse in the first place!
BBBCrone is offline  
post #25 of 63 Old 02-19-2013, 04:29 AM
Yearling
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 824
• Horses: 0
I brought my gelding from a lady that I hadnt known long and she did ask if I ever decided to sell him that I would give her the first option of buying him back. We never put anything down on paper and have lost touch for the most part but I would probably still let her know if I did sell. To me its a good sign if someone values the horse enough to want it back in the future or least to have that decision. If it got to the point where he had been retired and for whatever reason I could not keep him on then I would definitely consider letting her take him back. I doubt I would expect any payment in that situation though.
kiwi79 is offline  
post #26 of 63 Old 02-19-2013, 08:27 AM
Started
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,824
• Horses: 0
I hate right of first refusal. Sure I'll give a previous owner updates at MY discretion, but don't expect me to let you see the property and have unplanned visits. If you want to keep ties to the horse, don't sell the thing. UGH, some people!
Speed Racer likes this.

This is what happens when you have democrats in office
wetrain17 is offline  
post #27 of 63 Old 02-19-2013, 08:35 AM
Weanling
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Abilene, TX
Posts: 266
• Horses: 2
See to me though right of first refusal is only used when it comes time for you to sell. If you want to sell then I want first crack at buying back at whatever price you have it listed for. I think anyone saying well I get to buy it back at the price you payed me for it is stupid. I mean if you have put thousands of dollars and hours into additonal training then the horse will be worth more than you paid for it and I would expect to have to pay for that if I wanted my old horse back.

"For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future." Jeremiah 29:11
WorshipWarrior83 is offline  
post #28 of 63 Old 02-19-2013, 08:41 AM
Yearling
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,089
• Horses: 2
I do agree with visiting a property before you sell or lease a horse. It's great to see a persons other horses. If they're all in good condition it's a relief, if their horses are in a bad way don't leave the horse.
Right of first refusal is a privilege and a favor but it makes sense
Posted via Mobile Device
Prinella is offline  
post #29 of 63 Old 02-19-2013, 08:54 AM
Showing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Just south of sanity
Posts: 16,165
• Horses: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prinella View Post
I do agree with visiting a property before you sell or lease a horse.
Leasing yes, selling no. You have no right to visit my property if I've BOUGHT the animal. It's not yours anymore once you accept my money. Leasing is a whole other ballgame.

You want the truth? You can't HANDLE the truth!
Speed Racer is online now  
post #30 of 63 Old 02-19-2013, 09:01 AM
Weanling
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Abilene, TX
Posts: 266
• Horses: 2
SR they are talking about before the sale. Wanting to ensure you take care of your horses before selling you the horse is smart. Id want the peace of mind to know you will be taking care of my friend which is what my horses are to me.

Now if we are talking checking up on you after the sale well the previous owner is delusional if they think they have a right to do that. Once that sale is completed the only thing that I think they should have a right to is having the first crack at buying the horse back if it is being sold.
jaydee likes this.

"For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future." Jeremiah 29:11
WorshipWarrior83 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the The Horse Forum forums, you must first register.

Already have a Horse Forum account?
Members are allowed only one account per person at the Horse Forum, so if you've made an account here in the past you'll need to continue using that account. Please do not create a new account or you may lose access to the Horse Forum. If you need help recovering your existing account, please Contact Us. We'll be glad to help!

New to the Horse Forum?
Please choose a username you will be satisfied with using for the duration of your membership at the Horse Forum. We do not change members' usernames upon request because that would make it difficult for everyone to keep track of who is who on the forum. For that reason, please do not incorporate your horse's name into your username so that you are not stuck with a username related to a horse you may no longer have some day, or use any other username you may no longer identify with or care for in the future.



User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First right of refusal starlinestables Horse Law 53 11-14-2011 02:15 PM
Refusal to ride further than barn petera5 Horse Training 16 11-12-2011 08:33 PM
right of first refusal aerobicv Horse Law 5 03-15-2010 03:56 PM
Refusal or Pain? in Canter ShebaGurl Horse Tack and Equipment 10 05-28-2009 12:53 AM
Refusal labell Horse Training 4 08-15-2007 10:31 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome