Clinton V.S. Pat - Page 8
 
 

       The Horse Forum > Training Horses > Horse Trainers

Clinton V.S. Pat

This is a discussion on Clinton V.S. Pat within the Horse Trainers forums, part of the Training Horses category

    Like Tree293Likes

     
    LinkBack Thread Tools
        12-16-2012, 10:27 AM
      #71
    Foal
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by LesandLily    
    I prefer CA just cause I can't listen to PP. He drives me nuts...but he is a great trainer who learn from GREAT trainers.
    The snag with Pat is that his voice does send me to sleep, but nearly everything he says on a DVD is important, though at first I didn't realise this. It was only when James kept saying "everything you need for now is in the level 1 to 4 packs". I would challenge him occasionally and he would just say "watch them again". He would be right, it was in there, but as what initially just appeared to be a throw away remark through which I had probably dozed off . The more I learn the more information I find is in the packs.

    Sorry this is of topic but the above quote brought it to mind.
         
    Sponsored Links
    Advertisement
     
        12-16-2012, 06:21 PM
      #72
    twp
    Banned
    That's why I like to watch his bloopers!! Best show ever!! He should make a DVD of just Bloopers, to keep us all Entertained!!
         
        12-17-2012, 10:35 AM
      #73
    Yearling
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by twp    
    I thought a carrot stick was made of fiberglass?
    I always assumed that it was made out of carrots.
    twp likes this.
         
        12-17-2012, 09:17 PM
      #74
    twp
    Banned
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ian McDonald    
    I always assumed that it was made out of carrots.
    aahahaha!!

    It's a bribe thing!..Now it all Makes sense!
         
        12-21-2012, 06:19 AM
      #75
    Foal
    They had an hour long Clinton film on tv last night. First time I have seen him in action. Generally very impressed he seemed to use all the Pat Parelli games and taught them the same way. They had different names of course Sending Exercise = Squeeze Game, Desensitising = Friendly Game (though Clintons name for it does not convey its purpose which is confidence and reading of human neutral body language not desensitising), Sidepass = Sideways Game.
    I did pick up a few idea that I have never seen in Parelli, but felt that he was a little firmer than Pat. He seemed to expect more from the horse on a first attempt at a new exercise. Sideways (I mean Sidepass) went on for ages, where Pat would teach to release at the first "thought" of sideways and then slowly build on it.
    Surprised he made a big thing about there being no use for "sideways towards the handler". I use it all the time to mount from a fence or mounting block, getting the horse to come to me, at liberty, rather than lead them into position. The idea is to make them a part of the process. You can tell a lot if your horse suddenly does not sidepass to you to be mounted. They know this is the step before riding, and if they don't want to be ridden it is a gentle way of letting you know. Maybe best to check on the ground as to why before mounting and finding out !
    All in all I can see why folks like Clintons' teachings and I suspect that choosing Pat or Clinton is mostly a personal thing not a technical one. Maybe to do with the accent , though I did get a bit fed up with the number of times he said "OK" .
    I would think that studying both would be the best as both systems seem to be very compatible and one clinician cannot cover the entire topic, its' too big.
    kayhmk likes this.
         
        12-22-2012, 02:07 PM
      #76
    Yearling
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Pegasus1    
    (though Clintons name for it does not convey its purpose which is confidence and reading of human neutral body language not desensitising)
    I've never heard it put like that before, but that is exactly what I have in mind when I'm working with the flag. Is that Pat's explanation? It's a good way to think of it.
         
        12-22-2012, 03:01 PM
      #77
    Foal
    A large part of the purpose of the freindly game is to get the horse a) confident with whatever the human happens to want to do around him and b) understand what the neutral body language of the human is when the human is after no response other than to maintain its responsibilities. Maintain gait, maintain direction and look where you are going. Maintain gait could mean stand still of course.
    So by switching to friendly game after each other game (all of which require a response) then the horse learns the change in body language as the release is given.

    This translates into riding. Having given the cue to walk on and had it obeyed the human switches into neutral and expects the horse to keep its' responsibilities. That neutral does not mean I can't do other things, just I am not talking to the horse at the moment. After all you may be working a cow off that horse.

    Friendly game does not mean you have to have low energy, as I would have the walk energy still in my body when riding, but it does mean that I'm expecting nothing further from the horse at this moment, just keep doing what you are doing.
    What it teaches the horse is the difference in body language, not body energy, that means neutral.

    The way Friendly game is taught in Parelli level one with all that rope and stick swinging etc is not to desensitise the horse to the rope, (heaven forbid, they need to be sensitive to the rope) but to teach the human to be active but have no intention towards the horse in their body. If they have intention then the horse will react to the rope and the human gets feedback that their body language is not good enough yet.

    It also has the effect of getting the horse confident with the rope, stick etc. Confident but not desensitised. Once the horse is confident it will remain in a learning state of mind when the tools are used, not a fearful instinctive state of mind where nothing is learnt.

    I cannot imagine why we would want to desensitise the horse to the rope, stick or anything else. It would mean they became dull to their use.
    kayhmk likes this.
         
        12-22-2012, 03:31 PM
      #78
    Trained
    Desensitize is usually used to mean "not afraid of", not "unaware of"...
         
        12-22-2012, 04:30 PM
      #79
    Foal
    I guess it depends which version of desensitised - definition of desensitised by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia. you take. I prefer not to use it as some of the definitions are most definitely not what we want to achieve and so using the phrase "make confident with" avoids folks picking up on the wrong one. I guess James banned its' use as he wanted no possibility of such an important concept to be misconstrued by his students.
         
        12-26-2012, 12:33 AM
      #80
    Foal
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Pegasus1    
    Surprised he made a big thing about there being no use for "sideways towards the handler". I use it all the time to mount from a fence or mounting block, getting the horse to come to me, at liberty, rather than lead them into position.
    I like your thinking on this! I think it would be so perfect for my girl. I'm not too well-versed in Parelli (have his book and done the level 1 stuff, vintage 1999) so I don't know if and how (or where) he goes about teaching sideways towards the handler, but would LOVE to hear & learn about it! Can you tell me more?

    (Sorry to take the thread on a tangent.)
         

    Quick Reply
    Please help keep the Horse Forum enjoyable by reporting rude posts.
    Message:
    Options

    Register Now

    In order to be able to post messages on the The Horse Forum forums, you must first register.

    Already have a Horse Forum account?
    Members are allowed only one account per person at the Horse Forum, so if you've made an account here in the past you'll need to continue using that account. Please do not create a new account or you may lose access to the Horse Forum. If you need help recovering your existing account, please Contact Us. We'll be glad to help!

    New to the Horse Forum?
    Please choose a username you will be satisfied with using for the duration of your membership at the Horse Forum. We do not change members' usernames upon request because that would make it difficult for everyone to keep track of who is who on the forum. For that reason, please do not incorporate your horse's name into your username so that you are not stuck with a username related to a horse you may no longer have some day, or use any other username you may no longer identify with or care for in the future.

    User Name:
    Password
    Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
    Password:
    Confirm Password:
    Email Address
    Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
    Email Address:

    Log-in

    Human Verification

    In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


    Old Thread Warning
    This thread is more than 90 days old. When a thread is this old, it is often better to start a new thread rather than post to it. However, If you feel you have something of value to add to this particular thread, you can do so by checking the box below before submitting your post.

    Thread Tools

    Similar Threads
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    Clinton Anderson Lexiie Natural Horsemanship 48 05-07-2012 10:44 PM
    Clinton Anderson DVD JustPaint Tack and Equipment Classifieds 6 10-18-2010 08:34 PM
    clinton anderson dizzynurse Horse Talk 2 08-17-2010 09:06 PM
    Clinton Anderson SarahRicoh Natural Horsemanship 20 08-12-2010 07:01 PM
    Clinton Anderson hanse004 Horse Training 7 07-27-2007 03:04 PM



    All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:56 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
    Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0