Originally Posted by DraftyAiresMum View Post
What do you personally have against CA? Because it seems like everything you've put in this thread is a direct attack against him or at least insinuating unsubstantiated negatives about him.
Posted via Mobile Device
I have also wondered that. According to her, CA is obviously at fault, no way could an accident happened. She is just quoting the owners information. Maybe she is a friend of the owner? Maybe she is one of the "feeding frenzy" folks I was talking about. Drama drama drama
The way I see it, what happened is between CA and the owner. Nobody elses business. What happened is between them, not the internet, not all the nosy folks who demand to be told. Here is an example:someone brings their animal to the vet clinic. The animal dies during surgery for something.The DR and the owner discuss what happened and the probability of why. (possible reaction to anesthetic as an example, heart attack, etc) Owner doesn't want autopsy, even at Dr expense. So, case is closed. Or so DR thinks. But pretty soon his name is being spread all over as a bad vet, quack, animal killer, etc. Hmm, seems owner got on facebook, says her animal died and then the "feeding frenzy" folks get involved and the internet goes wild. Well, so and so had this happen at this DR's clinic. So and so says the vet dropped the dog on the floor before surgery. So and so says the dog died in its cage and didn't even have surgery. And the list goes on and on.
Remember the game "telephone" You sit in a big circle and whisper a word in the next person's ear? By the time it gets around the circle, the word turns into something totally different. Everyone has the right to defend themselves, especially against the internet nosybodies.
Anyone can say what they want, can say this particular trainer is bad, abusive, cruel, horses die with him, etc... don't send your horse there because he is cruel, yadda yadda.
It is nobody's business.. The horse is dead for whatever reason. Maybe she starved him so badly his system shut down. Animals that have feed withheld "so his naughty ways calm down" might not have been able to handle the work started on him, even though it is directly written to feed the animals "up" so they carry a bit more weight to begin the program.
I think there is alot more truth to this story than the owner is willing to admit. What we hear is her version and speculation by the internet "feeding frenzy" to keep it going.