Does anyone follow the methods of Klaus Ferdinand Hempfling? - Page 2
 
 

       The Horse Forum > Training Horses > Horse Training

Does anyone follow the methods of Klaus Ferdinand Hempfling?

This is a discussion on Does anyone follow the methods of Klaus Ferdinand Hempfling? within the Horse Training forums, part of the Training Horses category
  • Klaus Hempfling lawsuit
  • Is klaus ferdinand hemfling too extreme

Like Tree8Likes

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
    01-13-2013, 02:00 AM
  #11
Foal
I've incorporated some of his methods to my horsemanship mix for about 10 years now. Finally a couple of months ago bought Dancing With Horses for myself. Haven't really read and studied it yet, but plan to as soon as I have the time.

To answer the questions nettybear presented: I'm with Ian: yes to all.

I'm a Western rider sometimes straying into English and Spanish styles and have competed in Western events using ideas learnt from KFH.
     
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
    02-07-2013, 05:34 PM
  #12
Foal
Yay, so happy to have found this thread, I was half thinking of starting one myself...

I do not use Hempfling's methods myself - as of yet. But I've ordered his first book Dancing With Horses and I hope that will be informative enough for me to start trying with my own Connemara Silver. I absolutely love Hempfling's philosophy and the gentle way he seems to handle difficult horses. I really want to incorporate that in my daily life with Sil.

A question to the ones on here who use Hempfling's techniques with your horses - is it difficult to get it right, and do you think the book contains enough information to get started?
I'm planning on buying some of his DVDs too. I dream of going to his seminar, though of course that is faaaar too expensive for me to do ;)
     
    02-07-2013, 08:17 PM
  #13
Showing
Ian, I watch Klaus' classification of horses and was searching for what might best suit a particular horse I'd owned that was an awesome trail horse. He nailed it when I got to Pilgrim. It's like he knew my horse and we are an ocean apart. Altho I appreciate the work Klaus he realizes that it is best to work with the student rather than try to teach with videos. Has anyone looked into Carolyn Resnick's methods? Similar to KH. She has loads of info on her website if you join her blog - free. She starts by just spending time with the horse and asking nothing. She recommends her dvd Waterhole Rituals, how horses behave in the herd and how she brings this into her training.
     
    02-07-2013, 09:57 PM
  #14
Foal
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver Wings    
A question to the ones on here who use Hempfling's techniques with your horses - is it difficult to get it right, and do you think the book contains enough information to get started?
Getting it right -- yes, it is difficult. But so are many other things too, at least at first. I think this is also (partly) down to personality, past experience etc.: some find these things instinctively and some need the extra practice.

I think the book contains more than enough information to get started! The exercises and concepts are well illustrated. It's very easy to study things step-by-step. The book has only 197 pages, but it's all hard stuff, no fluff!
(Okay, might depend on you perception of "fluff"...)

Somehow I think DWH might be the best user of photography I've ever seen when it comes to horse (training) books. Like every photo is there for a reason and no important one was left behind. Also the descriptions/captions highlight them perfectly.

(Still, haven't had the time to read everything, so a grain of salt is needed.)
     
    02-28-2013, 04:28 PM
  #15
Foal
nettybear - I am really happy to find other people here who are interested in Hempflings approach to horses so I am glad I found your post. I have (tried my best) to follow his teaching since many years, after I participated in a course with him in Spain - I think it was in 1996 or something like that. I have read all his books (as well as the books of many other horse trainers) and he remains my best answer to how I can develop a genuine 'friendship' with a horse. I don't own a horse right now, because after my last horse passed away several years ago I decided to step back a bit to get a broader overview in order to do it right from the beginning the next time. But I have to say that I think I had a quite nice bond with that horse - thanks to what I learned from Hempfling (he was a pure pilgrim by the way, and I was so surprised because immmediately when I saw the picture of the Pilgrim I thought that resembled him very much, and then when I read the next I nearly fell from my chair by surprise - it was so precise - like if he would have used my Bossy as a model).

But - enough about me - sorry - this thread is about Hempfling :)

I think one of the most amazing things is that he is so non-methodical and actually I think his entire effort is to make us find our own authentic self so we can open up to the horses and really sense them - to learn interpretating what they really need and want, and to be strong enough to lead them just simply because we express a natural, kind but clear self-assurance - or something of that sort. I think his thoughts on dominance are very important and very unique, because they have nothing to do with the sort of dominance you experience the other trainers I have looked into - it is more like a kind of obligation to lead and really taking on the responsibility for the well-being of our horse and because of that being the one who leads. But I also think that he yields and gives the horse freedom to do as it likes as long as it does not overstep his limits.

I think it is a very good idea to read all three books he wrote, because together they really give you quite a complete picture of what he wants to transmit to us. And then I think his videos on YouTube are exceptionally good and many of them are quite instructional if you observe them carefully (and try to abstract from the extreme beauty of both horse and man :) so you don't forget to see what he is actually doing - or perhaps rather not doing!). I think his DVD's are very beautifull, but I think they are not extremely instructional and actually if you watch all his many, many videos on YT you have seen all the most important scenes from the DVD's.

Concerning his 26 character groups - I once read an interview with him where he said that he had to write that book and to order these characteristics because he had to explain people how he looks at a horse - how he sees and senses what kind of horse is in front of him, and to make them aware that there is a difference. He also said that he of course does not personally need to order them into character groups. But it is a way to make it easier to recognize the horses and to relate to some fundamental behaviours and ways of dealing with them - that means easier for us readers. I know someone who had a couple of character analysis done by him and she said it was extremely helpful. And as for myself, I thought it was much easier to understand my Pilgrim after I read the book, but I was also lucky to have one which was easy to identify I guess, because I suppose if you have a horse with 3-4 characters in it, then it can be very challenging.

Currently I am very eagerly following the weekly collumns by KFH on his official Facebook page - they are very interesting but also rather surprising. It would be interesting to hear what others think about these thesis. He is rather bold in his statements but they make a lot of sense!
     

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Klaus Ferdinand Hempfling - True Horsemanship? Doe Natural Horsemanship 90 07-03-2011 01:13 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0