More dangerous...bucking or rearing? - Page 2
 
 

       The Horse Forum > Training Horses > Horse Training

More dangerous...bucking or rearing?

This is a discussion on More dangerous...bucking or rearing? within the Horse Training forums, part of the Training Horses category
  • Horse rearing and bucking
  • Rearing and bucking horses

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
    08-13-2011, 02:09 AM
  #11
Banned
Rearing.

I'd take anything before I took a rearer. I'd take a bucker, biter, kicker, bolter, refuse-er; anything.

I wouldn't just dump a rearing horse off at an kill buyer auction though. If the horse was still good on the ground, I'd probably keep it for a companion horse/pasture pet.
     
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
    08-13-2011, 03:16 AM
  #12
Banned
If it is a choice of one of the other, then rearing. But the worst in my opinion is when you have a horse that combines rearing and bucking, as my former horse did.
That turns into a rodeo ride and is very difficult to maintain your balance with.
     
    08-13-2011, 09:08 AM
  #13
Trained
Rearing, because they can flip over on top of you. I will ride a rearing horse, but I don't like to at all. I would never buy a known rearer.
     
    08-13-2011, 09:49 AM
  #14
Green Broke
Truthfully, I'd take either. I've worked with both, and the reader was much easier to fix. If I felt him ge unbalanced, I jumped off and to the side. He always kept his balance and never went over, but he might have if I had let it get worse during the time I was riding/working with him.
I think it's much more difficult to balance on a horse that continuously bucks to get you off as opposed to one that goes up every once and awhile. I can keep a horse from rearing much more than a foot off the ground, I can't keep a bucking horse with it's head down from bucking without yanking their face off (especially when they're rode in curbs or anything but a mild snaffle). Sure, I can, but I don't want to have to yank their face off to keep their head up. I can just pull a rearer's head around and keep working him in circles/spins until he wants to walk, I don't feel bad doing that as opposed to yanking on a bucker's face to keep his bucks smaller or nonexistent.
So..after my babble, I think rearing is the more dangerous of the two, but I'd still choose a rearer over a horse that bucks.
Posted via Mobile Device
     
    08-13-2011, 10:06 AM
  #15
Banned
I agree with the majority....rearing.
     

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
He's bucking and rearing!! Luv 2 Ride Horse Training 19 03-03-2011 10:24 PM
REALLY NEED HELP. bucking and rearing. KawaiiCharlie Horse Training 23 03-02-2011 05:43 PM
bucking vs rearing? Wallaby Horse Riding 10 10-09-2009 11:12 PM
Fall:( (Rearing and Bucking) ChingazMyBoy Horse Riding 79 07-29-2009 05:33 PM
Dangerous Rearing Problem horse needs to not to move due to his foot issues HalfPass Horse Training 7 06-17-2009 09:26 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0