Rollkur / Hyperflexion
 
 

       The Horse Forum > Training Horses > Horse Training

Rollkur / Hyperflexion

This is a discussion on Rollkur / Hyperflexion within the Horse Training forums, part of the Training Horses category
  • Spanish riding school and rollkur
  • Overbending in dressage

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
    11-06-2008, 01:36 AM
  #1
Foal
Rollkur / Hyperflexion

Not sure if there is alreadya thread on this but I guess we can discuss it again anyway! :)

The extreme flexing of the horse at the poll and purposly overbending the horse. It's a method used by Anky Van Grunsven and many modern riders today.
Classically the horse were not meant to bend at all past the vertical at the poll, and debates have been created about weather it's bad for the horse. The classical dressage has been lost in the modern world and very limited people actually still train it. Most riders these days ride modernly, without knowing it or admitting to it because they do not completely understand.

If you want a bit more information because your not sure about it type rollkur or hyperflexion into google and loads of articles come up about it.

Here's a realllly detailed explanation from a classical dressage trainer about why it is not a classical method:
http://www.sustainabledressage.com/rollkur/index.php

What do you think about it? I'll write my thoughts later
     
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
    11-06-2008, 01:58 AM
  #2
Weanling
http://www.horseforum.com/debates/rolkur-15743/
     
    11-06-2008, 02:08 AM
  #3
Weanling
Im extremely against that so called method.

The horses are being asked to work blindly, and every single photo I have seen of it the horse has looked horribly uncomfortable. Its totally
Un-natural for the horse ,not to mention a ' cheap ' way of training ....... by that I mean its one of those quick fix ideas, instead of the years of training put into the classical way of getting the same flexion and such.

Makes me furious
     
    11-06-2008, 04:07 AM
  #4
Yearling
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitless    
Im extremely against that so called method.

The horses are being asked to work blindly, and every single photo I have seen of it the horse has looked horribly uncomfortable. Its totally
Un-natural for the horse ,not to mention a ' cheap ' way of training ....... by that I mean its one of those quick fix ideas, instead of the years of training put into the classical way of getting the same flexion and such.

Makes me furious
I couldn't have said it better.
I belong to the Ultimate Dressage forum... and Rollkur is a hot topic there... the consensus being completely against the so called method. To me it's incredibly unnatural... and if they think the horses look lovely doing it... I personally disagree.
x
     
    11-06-2008, 09:20 AM
  #5
Banned
Didn't Anky actually create it (well gave it a name and introduced it to dressage?)? And my friend wonders why I'm extremely anti-Anky and any dressage rider that does that. I am 500% against it even if they do it for a second to get more power for one move. Doing it accidently without realizing is one thing because they aren't purposely trying to hurt the horse, but doing it on purpose for the sake of looks?! ARG that makes me mad

Just look into the eyes of ANY horse that has it done to them. What do you see? Pain? Fear? Confusion? Pain because it overbending them and stretching the muscles too much. Fear because they trusted the rider and that is what they are doing to them....and they have less of a field of vision while in that position. Confusion because this rider whom they followed and possibly loved unconditionally is doing that horrible thing to them.

I in no way or form would say that Rolkur/Hyperflextion is right nor should be done. It's a horrible thing and I'm surprised it's still legal.
     
    11-06-2008, 01:30 PM
  #6
Zab
Yearling
Anky didn't create it, Francios Baucher did around the year of 1850. But Anky and the top riders have modified it, after what I've learnt. The original thought is to keep it for 1-2 seconds to stretch the horse and get it's full attention..I think, I havn't read the whole book yet:P I'm not really sure what I think of it if it's used like that. Maybe I could tolerate it on some horses... I'm not sure.
But as the top riders ride today..it's just disgusting. It's against all what dressage stands for; the horse is on the shoulders, nose far behind the vertical, the aids are all but subtle.. and that's not even mentioning the moral issues and how the horse feel. I'd cramp in my neck if it was held like that more than a minute..
Only thing it does is that the horse keeps the nose in place and thus you eliminate the most obvious sign of inbalance; that the horse throws up the head o regain balance. Even when the horse is allowed in a normal head position, it's still on the withers since it hasn't learnt to carry with the hindquarter.

I ride classical, or I'm trying to learn. My instructor has learnt academic riding (for Bent Branderup, the re-inventor of this type of classical dressage) and I've also been at his stables and had a few lessons for one of his students. She (my instructor) mostly rides centered riding tho, and has been teached from riders in the spanish riding school as well, she mixes it to a good portion of classical dressage, avoiding the overbending in academic and so on.
I'm still as much of a newbie as you can be xD But I've learnt more this few months than I have in 12 years of regular riding :P
I'm very much looking forward to a clinic with Desmond Obrien this spring, this time I'll ride for him too. (Rider in the spanish riding school in Vienna several years ago).
This drifted a bit off topic, but you did mention classical dressage. X) I can reccomend it.
I can also recomend the book ''tug of war'' if you're interested about classical vs modern dressage (fit for the competitions, which I guess mine isn't since it's a bit different yet). The website mentioned before is very good too.
     
    11-06-2008, 08:20 PM
  #7
Banned
Oh ok....yeah I just read that Anky created it...but modifying it is close enough lol

Yeah it is really only supposed to be for 1-2 seconds, but in my opinion, it shouldn't be used at all. None of the dressage riders that I've seen do it, do it for 1-2 seconds. Using Anky....she uses for 10 minutes + without stop. THe horse is fighting, trying to buck and rear but it can't....and she totally is cruel about the whole matter.
And if the "professionals" can't do it correctly, and alot of people look up to the professionals, will anyone know how it was supposed to be used? So IMO, though the action for 1-2 seconds might not be too much of a bad thing, people's actions on it and how they are using it should be stopped...and probably the only way to do that is by making it illegal.
     
    11-06-2008, 09:02 PM
  #8
Zab
Yearling
Except that making it illegal probably won't work either.. nobody sees in the backyard..:/
But if the judging system changed, so that judges could rate the rider fairly without worrying about their own future, people with horses on the withers and that can't stand stillin the halt wouldn't win the Olympics..
And thn less people would imitate them..
     
    11-06-2008, 10:10 PM
  #9
Banned
Well of course it wouldn't stop people from doing it...Fighting Pits is illegal...yet people still do it.
But getting it out of professional sports would help decrease the users. So many people "look up to" a famous rider and want to be just like them...well 75% of them will also try the techniques also.
If the riders CANNOT make videos, or show doing rolkur that would decrease some of it
     
    11-06-2008, 10:21 PM
  #10
Weanling
I don't like the idea of rolkur. I don't think a horse should work in that state. If a horse hyperflexes the neck on an doff in the walk a few strides....that might help them stretch out differently and might be nice for training...but doing and more than a few strides in walk with such a frame is terrible and detrimental to the horses state of mind. Its not natural in the least. Doing complete dressage in a hyperflexion state is detrimental!
     

Quick Reply
Please help keep the Horse Forum enjoyable by reporting rude posts.
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Horse Forum forums, you must first register.

Already have a Horse Forum account?
Members are allowed only one account per person at the Horse Forum, so if you've made an account here in the past you'll need to continue using that account. Please do not create a new account or you may lose access to the Horse Forum. If you need help recovering your existing account, please Contact Us. We'll be glad to help!

New to the Horse Forum?
Please choose a username you will be satisfied with using for the duration of your membership at the Horse Forum. We do not change members' usernames upon request because that would make it difficult for everyone to keep track of who is who on the forum. For that reason, please do not incorporate your horse's name into your username so that you are not stuck with a username related to a horse you may no longer have some day, or use any other username you may no longer identify with or care for in the future.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Old Thread Warning
This thread is more than 90 days old. When a thread is this old, it is often better to start a new thread rather than post to it. However, If you feel you have something of value to add to this particular thread, you can do so by checking the box below before submitting your post.

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0