Showing versus Riding
   

       The Horse Forum > Training Horses > Horse Training

Showing versus Riding

This is a discussion on Showing versus Riding within the Horse Training forums, part of the Training Horses category

     
    LinkBack Thread Tools
        01-27-2007, 01:24 AM
      #1
    Foal
    Showing versus Riding

    I have a yearling colt (Mac), I am going to show him Halter this year. He is at a friend's place until I fence my property. Anyway....he is there with his 1/2 brother Rickson (pronounced Hickson), Rickson is going to the trainers to be broke Jan. '08 as a 2 year old or shortly thereafter. I was going to send Mac with Rickson to be broke at the same time as they are the same age but I have been advised to show Mac until he gets his Superior in Halter (if he is that good) and break him after that to ride and whatever else I choose to do with him. I am undecided as to what I am going to do so any advise would be appreciated.

    Samantha
         
    Sponsored Links
    Advertisement
     
        02-01-2007, 09:12 AM
      #2
    Foal
    I would delay breaking him if possible, just because I feel that horses benefit from some more maturity before starting under saddle.

    Showing at halter allows you to still work a lot with him, but lets him develop more before he has to have a rider. You can also have him broken with only a couple of rides so that you feel comfortable with his ability to accept a rider when he's older.
         
        02-03-2007, 12:01 AM
      #3
    Foal
    Thanks for the info... :)

    Does any one else have an opinion one way or the other?

    Samantha
         
        02-03-2007, 01:03 PM
      #4
    Yearling
    I would wait until he was 2 and half or 3 before I had him trained, but that's just me
         
        02-03-2007, 10:48 PM
      #5
    Yearling
    The average horse's growth stops at five- some with a shorter or longer time period depending on the breed. Personally, I wouldn't consider any under saddle work until after the age of three. Even then, if the horse is highly undeveloped, I would post pone. It isn't worth the deterioration and interference with a horse's growth in my perspective. At three, I would consider desensitizing by placing a saddle on the back and exposure to tack. If the horse has developed well, I would break at 3 1/2 with basic walk, trot and canter. Nothing, by any means, grueling.
    My horse was finally gelded at the age of eight and then trained to be ridden. Eight is a very long time to wait, yes, but now that he is at the age of 22, I am very happy that he didn't have the unnecessary and stressful training too early - his health reflects that.

    Just my opinion.
         
        02-06-2007, 02:03 PM
      #6
    Foal
    I have to agree. There's nothing wrong with waiting to start under saddle. There's plenty of work you can do on the ground until the horse is older.
         

    Thread Tools



    All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
    Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0