What do YOU all think about this? - The Horse Forum
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 31 Old 08-05-2012, 05:15 PM Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: East Central Illinois
Posts: 7,109
• Horses: 3
What do YOU all think about this?

Sorry, couldn't figure out where to post this story link re: Canadian horse disqualification

London 2012 Olympics: controversy as Tiffany Foster's show jumping horse is disqualified for failing a sensitivity test - Telegraph
It is SOOOO reminiscent of getting my Coggins/health papers checked at a CW event by some bozo who doesn't know what end of the horse to feed, but I guess that's just MHO.
Corporal is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 31 Old 08-05-2012, 05:28 PM
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 479
• Horses: 2
I think it's very unlucky for the poor girl, and she shouldn't be being accused of anything, but I agree with the FEI that failing these tests should result in elimination. It doesn't necessarily mean that the horse has been hyper-sensitised, but if he's feeling sensitive in his feet then it is safer to eliminate and stick to the rules, and know that the horse is neither going to be in pain or have been badly treated, than let her compete, go clear, even win, and everyone be slightly doubting her. It's really, really bad luck, but it's the rules, unfortunately :(.
minstrel is offline  
post #3 of 31 Old 08-06-2012, 01:21 AM
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,634
• Horses: 2
Well, being a Canadian I'm really upset as it puts our team at a disadvantage.
jumanji321 is offline  
post #4 of 31 Old 08-06-2012, 01:37 AM
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: An English Girl living in beautiful Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,606
• Horses: 0
In answer to your question I feel massively sorry for the rider, team, and supporters.

But I don't think it's the actions of a bozo, I think it's the highly trained specialist veterinary team seeking to comply with the incredibly tight rules that have absolutely no wriggle-room for subjectivity. I don't doubt that THIS tiny cut on the coronet band was an unfortunate unplanned injury - but imagine if it had been allowed......... What then if another competitor had two 'accidental cuts' on the coronet band, or on both front feet? The rules are there for a purpose
AlexS and Foxhunter like this.

Get up, get going, seize the day. Enjoy the sunshine, the rain, cloudy days, snowstorms, and thunder. Getting on your horse is always worth the effort.
Shropshirerosie is offline  
post #5 of 31 Old 08-06-2012, 07:49 AM
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,772
• Horses: 2
Posted via Mobile Device
CLaPorte432 is offline  
post #6 of 31 Old 08-06-2012, 08:52 AM
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: nw NJ
Posts: 5,973
• Horses: 2
The bit that I wonder about is how they perform these tests. From the little I read, it entails poking the horses leg in or around the same spot over and over and over. One article said 50 times.

I think I'd flinch if someone kept poking me that many times. So not having been there, it's so very hard to say whether it was right or not.

Jake and Dai is offline  
post #7 of 31 Old 08-06-2012, 11:04 AM
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 810
• Horses: 0
I think it's a gross misunderstanding of a rule that cannot be contested which is such a huge injustice towards Tiffany Foster.

Victor was worked that morning and deemed 100% sound by the Canadian staff. We have some of the best and brightest people that travel with members of the Olympic equestrian team and the notion that Victor was at risk of injuring himself or at an advantage due to the hypersensitivity is pure insanity. (The injury was reported to be a scratch above the hoof. A scratch for frig sakes!)
princess warrior likes this.
jinxremoving is offline  
post #8 of 31 Old 08-06-2012, 01:22 PM
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Beautiful British Columbia
Posts: 53
• Horses: 2
Apparently now there is another rider from another team that has been DQ'd for the same reason. I couldn't catch the name of the rider to the team, I was busy in the kitchen making breakfast, lol!!
But how tight do the rules have to be? Of course they are there for the betterment of both horse and rider. But sometimes you get the feeling that perhaps there's a little more political BS going on behind the scenes.
princess warrior likes this.
LegendsChic is offline  
post #9 of 31 Old 08-06-2012, 01:37 PM
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: In the saddle.
Posts: 5,157
• Horses: 1
I will side with the FEI because I know the regulations they are under are very strict and are that way for a reason. Yes the Canadians are crying about subjectivity but the FEI does not know how the injury got there. From what it sounds like to me the horse has a cut AND a crack in the hoof and is hypersensitive to it being touched.
Although the warm ups at FEI events are highly, highly regulated and there is security everywhere there is still sketchy stuff that goes on "behind the barn".. again the FEI does not know HOW the injury got there and IMO it is unlikely that the horse just thwacked itself in the stall. If the horse was prone to that they would have had bells or similar on the front to prevent such an injury.

It also really irks me how people always ride the FEI about upholding welfare (re: Rolkur and the blood rule, etc..) and then when they do pull an injured horse out of competition for hypersensitivity and an injury bad enough to pull up a result on a thermo everyone cries about it. I've had horses thermo scanned and while yes they will show a bit of heat where there all small injuries it is barely a blup. For the FEI to use the thermo results as grounds for elimination there must be quite an anomaly.

And of course, there are no pictures posted of the injury. When Adelinde's horse was eliminated via the blood rule two years ago, there were pictures of a pinpricked sized boo-boo flying around the internet within hours and Adelinde and the Dutch complaining about "why is this injury cause for elimination?" causing an inquiry into the blood rule. If the injury really isn't all that bad - where are the pictures??? And if the injury isn't that bad then WHY is the FEI vet claiming he would have the horse on antibiotics and not be riding it???

Choose - do you want the FEI to uphold welfare or not?!
Gremmy, HowClever, AlexS and 4 others like this.

They say money doesn't buy happiness -- well happiness doesn't buy horses!
~*~anebel~*~ is offline  
post #10 of 31 Old 08-06-2012, 02:00 PM
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cariboo, British Columbia
Posts: 11,777
• Horses: 3
Agreed, would be interesting to see pictures of the injury right after the ruling, not after it had time to heal.
Posted via Mobile Device
waresbear is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Horse Forum forums, you must first register.

Already have a Horse Forum account?
Members are allowed only one account per person at the Horse Forum, so if you've made an account here in the past you'll need to continue using that account. Please do not create a new account or you may lose access to the Horse Forum. If you need help recovering your existing account, please Contact Us. We'll be glad to help!

New to the Horse Forum?
Please choose a username you will be satisfied with using for the duration of your membership at the Horse Forum. We do not change members' usernames upon request because that would make it difficult for everyone to keep track of who is who on the forum. For that reason, please do not incorporate your horse's name into your username so that you are not stuck with a username related to a horse you may no longer have some day, or use any other username you may no longer identify with or care for in the future.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Old Thread Warning
This thread is more than 90 days old. When a thread is this old, it is often better to start a new thread rather than post to it. However, If you feel you have something of value to add to this particular thread, you can do so by checking the box below before submitting your post.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome