Horsemen: Where has our common sense gone? - Page 18
   

       The Horse Forum > Training Horses > Natural Horsemanship

Horsemen: Where has our common sense gone?

This is a discussion on Horsemen: Where has our common sense gone? within the Natural Horsemanship forums, part of the Training Horses category

    Like Tree159Likes

     
    LinkBack Thread Tools
        08-08-2011, 03:25 AM
      #171
    Weanling
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by kiwigirl    
    Here is a simple one. How do you teach a horse to load on a float. Step by step, please instruct me. I want to know if there is a better way.
    floats are too cave-like. You're a bully if you put your horse on a float.
         
    Sponsored Links
    Advertisement
     
        08-08-2011, 01:16 PM
      #172
    Foal
    Cool

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by christopher    
    floats are too cave-like. You're a bully if you put your horse on a float.
    Are you referring to a horse trailer.
         
        08-08-2011, 01:27 PM
      #173
    Showing
    Goodhrs, yes he was talking about trailers but I believe christopher's comment was more of a tongue-in-cheek response to some of the things that were said earlier in the thread.
         
        08-08-2011, 01:51 PM
      #174
    Weanling
    I'm still working my way through all the replies, and though it's not really on track with the original post, all of these types of threads have me wondering:

    WHAT exactly IS natural horsemanship? I was under the impression that "NH" means you're working to communicate with the horse in a way it understands instead of just jumping on its back and riding the buck out of it. If that's the case, then I would think we ALL practice natural horsemanship, at least to some extent.

    But there seems to be such a firm line between NH and non-NH, as you can see even with the creation of this sub-forum in Training. Clearly, my impression of what natural horsemanship is is not the way everyone else sees it.

    Basically, what I'm getting here is: Natural Horsemanship is the term afforded to those who follow a special, commercialized "NH" clinician or trainer, or otherwise you're not a "natural horseman". Is this about it?

    I'm really not clear on what exactly natural horsemanship is supposed to be.
         
        08-08-2011, 02:13 PM
      #175
    Doe
    Weanling
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by pintophile    
    I'm still working my way through all the replies, and though it's not really on track with the original post, all of these types of threads have me wondering:

    WHAT exactly IS natural horsemanship? I was under the impression that "NH" means you're working to communicate with the horse in a way it understands instead of just jumping on its back and riding the buck out of it. If that's the case, then I would think we ALL practice natural horsemanship, at least to some extent.

    But there seems to be such a firm line between NH and non-NH, as you can see even with the creation of this sub-forum in Training. Clearly, my impression of what natural horsemanship is is not the way everyone else sees it.

    Basically, what I'm getting here is: Natural Horsemanship is the term afforded to those who follow a special, commercialized "NH" clinician or trainer, or otherwise you're not a "natural horseman". Is this about it?

    I'm really not clear on what exactly natural horsemanship is supposed to be.
    That is exactly the point I keep trying to make. People get so hung up on NH or Non NH and wanting to be associated or not associated with it as the case may be that advancement and discussion of true horsemanship gets lost.

    In this context I would say NH is simply any form of negative reinforcement training that is marketed as a system, and which usually justifies itself with 'this is what horses understand'.

    So that includes all the Parrelli and ex-Parelli trainers, Anderson, Westfall, Monty Roberts, Cox, Lyons, Cameron etc etc etc whether they appear to be a new stick twirling type or a cowboy type makes no difference. The sooner people worked that out the better we'd all be and the more we'd accomplish.
         
        08-08-2011, 10:45 PM
      #176
    Trained
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by spirithorse8    
    ................

    , I do so with the foundation of the schooling arising from the requirements of the horse and the benefits to the horse. Doing such allows the client to hear the horse. It is not about stroking my ego, it is about allowing the horse to be your equal. "Supreme Performance Through Supreme Freedom" and that means both the physical and psychological interactions of horse and rider.
    Your horse is your equal huh? So it pays taxes & helps around the shack? Phoney baloney on that pony. I go to work & bust my butt to feed the nag and pays it's vet bills and stick my hands in it's watertank at -40F to scoop out poop he left in there for me, and you're telling me he's my equal???? I think not, I am his slave. But the least he can do for me is pack me around the showpen on his back & not embarrass me!
         
        08-08-2011, 11:11 PM
      #177
    Foal
    Talking

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by spirithorse8    
    it is about allowing the horse to be your equal. "Supreme Performance Through Supreme Freedom"
    Just WTHeck does this mean, Equal, that doesnt even make good sense:roll:. There is no way horse & human are equal. Good lord man, just physical strength if nothing else, well nothing else for that matter.
         
        08-08-2011, 11:43 PM
      #178
    Trained
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Doe    
    In this context I would say NH is simply any form of negative reinforcement training that is marketed as a system, and which usually justifies itself with 'this is what horses understand'.

    So that includes all the Parrelli and ex-Parelli trainers, Anderson, Westfall, Monty Roberts, Cox, Lyons, Cameron etc etc etc whether they appear to be a new stick twirling type or a cowboy type makes no difference. The sooner people worked that out the better we'd all be and the more we'd accomplish.
    Doe, I actually agree with a lot of what you say but you seem to have the habit of calling well known horsemen incompetent and wrong while not offering much about how you would do it better.
    Marecare likes this.
         
        08-09-2011, 12:33 AM
      #179
    Foal
    The thing about NH is the training is only as good as the person doing the training. The NH people turn out "trainers" who are people who have paid a crazy amount of money to go take a class or two. As a general rule most of the NH trainers can't teach a horse to round and be collected. Their horses lope around with their backs hollow and strung out. The horse won't stay sound if they are ridden much distance in that frame (or lack of). Also I agree with the person who said many of the NH trainers never get on the horses back. Lots of ground work is wonderful because the horse learns to trust but the horse needs to be ridden to transfer the trust to the rider from the ground. Another point is all the "stuff" they are selling. A true horseman frankly doesn't need any of that to get a horse to understand him. They use body language and presence. This is something that can be learned but also has to be inside a person.
         
        08-09-2011, 12:46 AM
      #180
    Yearling
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BoxT    
    The thing about NH is the training is only as good as the person doing the training. The NH people turn out "trainers" who are people who have paid a crazy amount of money to go take a class or two. As a general rule most of the NH trainers can't teach a horse to round and be collected. Their horses lope around with their backs hollow and strung out. The horse won't stay sound if they are ridden much distance in that frame (or lack of). Also I agree with the person who said many of the NH trainers never get on the horses back. Lots of ground work is wonderful because the horse learns to trust but the horse needs to be ridden to transfer the trust to the rider from the ground. Another point is all the "stuff" they are selling. A true horseman frankly doesn't need any of that to get a horse to understand him. They use body language and presence. This is something that can be learned but also has to be inside a person.
    Very well put!!
         

    Thread Tools

    Similar Threads
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    Common Sense Beau Baby Barn Maintenance 7 01-10-2011 09:04 PM
    Common Sense smrobs General Off Topic Discussion 22 12-08-2010 06:31 PM
    Natural Horsemen? nobody2121 Natural Horsemanship 75 09-07-2010 07:03 PM
    Obituary of the late Mr. Common Sense PaintedHooves General Off Topic Discussion 4 08-29-2009 09:58 AM



    All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
    Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0