Some weight carrying thoughts, or questions - Page 2
 
 

       The Horse Forum > The Horse Forum Community > Plus Sized Riders

Some weight carrying thoughts, or questions

This is a discussion on Some weight carrying thoughts, or questions within the Plus Sized Riders forums, part of the The Horse Forum Community category

    Like Tree62Likes

     
    LinkBack Thread Tools
        10-24-2012, 12:51 PM
      #11
    Foal
    Not completely... Still paying him off until I can bring him home. He's lame due to an injury sustained during turnout anyway :( poor baby. He probably did it breaking through a fence!
    Posted via Mobile Device
         
    Sponsored Links
    Advertisement
     
        10-24-2012, 12:52 PM
      #12
    Trained
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Birdz    
    He's lame due to an injury sustained during turnout anyway :( poor baby. He probably did it breaking through a fence!
    Posted via Mobile Device

    Not a poor baby then! Self inflicted
         
        10-25-2012, 02:50 AM
      #13
    Foal
    You didn't tell me you were paying him off! Shame on you Birdz ;) That's awesome!
    Posted via Mobile Device
         
        10-25-2012, 10:04 AM
      #14
    Green Broke
    People really need to quit spouting off that 20% nonsense, do you even know the source ? Or are you just constantly regurgitating it because the last person did. Just one of those completely false old wives tales with no basis in science that gets repeated over and over and over.
    SO a fat out of shape pasture puff can carry more weight than a trained conditioned horse that weighs less ?
    So every single male western rider int he country is wrong and overloading anythign but the Budweiser Clydesdale ?
    So for several hundred years when horses averaged about 14 hands, and probably 700-800 lbs, an actual unit of measure was a "Horse weight"(200 lbs) using in the pack horse transport industry.
    Oh and BTW, a study on the 100 mile Tevis endurance race, with several hundred riders a year going back ten years, probably one of the hardest races int he world. Found ZERO nadda, nix nine frankenstein correlation between rider weight percentages up to around 32% ( highest percent studied) and completion rates. Or in top 10 finishers.
    Bellasmom, peppersgirl and Tracer like this.
         
        10-25-2012, 11:10 AM
      #15
    Super Moderator
    Somebody posted a different way of calculating somewhere here. Bodyweight divided by circumference of mid cannon bone divided by 2. If the result is less than 75 you're good to go, and anything over 80 is too heavy.
    But, that also means an overweight horse could carry more weight which I find highly unlikely.

    I do remember reading about a test the army did after WW II, 14 h Arabs carried 240 lbs over all kinds of terrain over several days without any problems. Don't quote me on the numbers, tho, but it was quite high.

    I think it has a lot more to do with how the horse is built. And its fitness level and breed.
         
        10-25-2012, 12:03 PM
      #16
    Trained
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Joe4d    
    People really need to quit spouting off that 20% nonsense, do you even know the source
    Horses

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by deserthorsewoman    
    Somebody posted a different way of calculating somewhere here. Bodyweight divided by circumference of mid cannon bone divided by 2. If the result is less than 75 you're good to go, and anything over 80 is too heavy.
    But, that also means an overweight horse could carry more weight which I find highly unlikely.
    I actually like this method, it is calculating the weight of both horse and rider and working out the carrying ability by the amount of bone.

    That is actually fairer than the 20% rule because simply using those numbers a fat horse could be calculated as being able to carry more than a thin horse
         
        10-25-2012, 12:15 PM
      #17
    Super Moderator
    Oops, forgot to add weight of rider and tack
    So, it is:
    Weight of horse, rider and tack divided by circumference of mid cannon divided by 2
         
        10-25-2012, 12:26 PM
      #18
    Green Broke
    Atill pretty ,meaningless as most people wouldnt know the body weight of their horse if it fell on them. Weight tapes are a joke, and how many people put their horses on an actual scale ? I have, but as muscles, fat and hydration levels change those numbers change also. A 920lb horse can loose 40 to 50 lbs of water pretty quickly.
    Breed, confirmation, condition, age, temperature, terrain, all have a much greater influence on load ability than some arbitrary pulled out of thin air percent.

    BTW Gen George McClellan, an admitted horse lover and man hater did a study using data collected in the summer in the soutwest, that found Calvary horses, could carry 20 % all day every day, and only be fed at night and last for months with out breaking down. Of course again, how did he weigh the horses ? And when did he weigh them morning or after being rode all day. Anyway he published an Army cavalry manual using those numbers and they have been getting repeated as the gospel ever sense.
    Keep in mind this self proclaimed "expert" in cavalry consistently had his cavalry embarrassed by the poor unfortunate unedumacated southern cavalry.
         
        10-25-2012, 06:13 PM
      #19
    Foal
    Here's a link to a weight estimator The Horse | Weight Calculator and here's a formula for calculating a horse's weight for a horse older than one year (heart girth x heart girth x body length)/330=estimated body weight in pounds. For a weanling, divide by 280, and for a yearling, divide by 301.
         
        10-25-2012, 07:44 PM
      #20
    Super Moderator
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Golden Horse    
    Horses



    I actually like this method, it is calculating the weight of both horse and rider and working out the carrying ability by the amount of bone.

    That is actually fairer than the 20% rule because simply using those numbers a fat horse could be calculated as being able to carry more than a thin horse
    not so sure if it's fairer.
    Example:
    1000lbs horse: 20%=200lbs
    1000lbs horse+ 220lbsrider+40lbs tack : 8" cannon : 2=78.75, so still in the range.
    So according to that way, a 1000lbs horse with a not so strong bone(for his weight) could carry 260lbs.
    1200lbs horse+250lbs rider+40lbs tack: 9" bone comes out to 82.78, so too heavy.
         

    Quick Reply
    Please help keep the Horse Forum enjoyable by reporting rude posts.
    Message:
    Options

    Register Now

    In order to be able to post messages on the The Horse Forum forums, you must first register.

    Already have a Horse Forum account?
    Members are allowed only one account per person at the Horse Forum, so if you've made an account here in the past you'll need to continue using that account. Please do not create a new account or you may lose access to the Horse Forum. If you need help recovering your existing account, please Contact Us. We'll be glad to help!

    New to the Horse Forum?
    Please choose a username you will be satisfied with using for the duration of your membership at the Horse Forum. We do not change members' usernames upon request because that would make it difficult for everyone to keep track of who is who on the forum. For that reason, please do not incorporate your horse's name into your username so that you are not stuck with a username related to a horse you may no longer have some day, or use any other username you may no longer identify with or care for in the future.

    User Name:
    Password
    Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
    Password:
    Confirm Password:
    Email Address
    Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
    Email Address:

    Log-in

    Human Verification

    In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


    Old Thread Warning
    This thread is more than 90 days old. When a thread is this old, it is often better to start a new thread rather than post to it. However, If you feel you have something of value to add to this particular thread, you can do so by checking the box below before submitting your post.

    Thread Tools

    Similar Threads
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    Horse losing weight...thoughts? Blondehorselover Horse Health 8 12-30-2011 09:45 AM
    Carrying weight differently? wild_spot Horse Health 7 11-13-2011 08:43 PM
    Weight Questions apachewhitesox Horse Health 9 07-07-2011 12:17 AM
    Weight Questions.. mountainhorse44 Horse Health 4 09-29-2009 11:31 AM
    What breed of horsse would be good carrying alot of weight?? First time horse owner Horse Breeds 29 03-30-2007 04:13 AM



    All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:47 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
    Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0