Critigue This Stallion
I'm currious. Does he seem to have a slight back at the knee? Here are some other pictures. I just couldn't tell and maybe I'm just needing some coffee this morning. Opinions Please.
Looking at them now....I need to some coffee.
I don't know, but I think the first picture looks photoshopped.
Not back at the knee. Butt high and a bit straight thru the hock and stifle.. Weak coupling and peak of rump too far back.
Background in the top photo has been photoshopped as well as the background in the lower picture.
BTW what is his claim to fame? Titles?
Why is he uphill in the first pic and drastically down hill in the second? =/
The whole horse looks photoshopped, unless he gained or lost a lot of muscle mass on the top of his rump. I find him slightly over at the knee. Pretty head.
The background in the second picture is not photoshopped.
His head is huge O.o
The fence looks photoshopped in the second pic.... so I'm not convinced BOTH aren't edited photos.
I can't figure out why they'd photoshop like that... if they photoshop the background, why not the horse, too? I wouldn't trust these pics at all.
Default-PR Tells a Tale
It said he was bred by Pryor Ranch.
I don't know anything else except that supposively he had lost muscle mass at one time just reading through the picture comments.
|All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 AM.|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2016 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2016 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.