My 3 year old Quarter Horse has been started and he responds really well in just a halter so I'm not really inclined to use a bit on him yet. What are the pro's and con's or a Hackamore vs. a Bosal?
To clarrify, sorry, the bitless options I posted were ones I find more useful because they offer sideways pull rather than only having the option of neck reining.
Moroso231, Thank you for the info. Its very helpful.
Kevinshorses, Thank you for the comment, but I dont see now telling me most people dont know how to use them correctly helps me. Possibly telling me how you use them properly may help me decide.
You're welcome. The only other advice I can really offer is to NOT get a sidepull with the rope/waxed rope noseband. They are less expensive but can rub the skin raw if use incorrectly. Hope I helped.
If it was simple enough that I could explain it it a few paragraphs on an internet forum then people wouldn't be using them improperly. There are resources available if you look for them but the best way is to find someone that knows how to use them and can demonstrate that knowledge and learn from them.
Unfortunately, Kevin is right. IMHO a mechanical hackamore is harsh and confusing and most people have no business using them anyway. The bosal, on the other hand, is a very good tool in the right hands but it takes years of experience with an experienced teacher to be able to use them properly and teach a horse to respond properly to them. I am just beginning to learn how to use them and I have my Dad helping me. He studied for a few years under one of the old California vaquero's, who knew how to make a true "bridle horse". I believe that if you are getting along well in the halter, there really isn't much reason to change.
Thank you every one. I wasn't to keen on a hackamore but I thought I'd ask. My trail horse that I had about 12 years ago was in a hack but I bought him with tack. I'm going to keep on with the rope halter but I think I'm going to give the Indian Bosal a shot, its pretty much exactly what I was looking for. Thank you again for all your feedback.
I think you will like it. Buy good quality & I think you will like it. I don't have any binding problems myself but use fairly heavy rope & reins with a bit of weight to them. If your horse is well trained,simple voice, hand movement & leg pressure will be pretty much all you need. Sometimes I think the bridle & reins are more for the rider than the horse.
Can anyone tell me the difference between all the fancy bitless halters, and a simple classical halter?
I find it confusing that there is a lot to do about which bitless bridle to use, and then see people riding a horse without a bridle.
I have little experience with different bitless bridles.
I do ride my horse with a classical leather halter and one rope, out on a hack, occasionally. When it's a steady hack.
When things get a bit more excited, I think a bit is the safest thing.
I do think riding bitless is a very good teaching method to force horse and rider to use their *** more.
Once the riding skills are improving, the used method can go from bitless to snaffle up to western bits with shanks.
WHat I don't like is strong bitless bridles - such as a hackamore with levers. The forces that are applied here are so strong that there is no point in going bitless.
Aspin231, what do you think?
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
The Horse Forum
3.4M posts
92.6K members
Since 2006
A forum community dedicated to horse owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about breeding, grooming, reviews, health, behavior, housing, adopting, care, classifieds, and more!