Continuing the saddle design....Forms, now the Trees - Page 2
 
 

       The Horse Forum > Horse Tack > Horse Tack and Equipment > Saddle Fitting Issues

Continuing the saddle design....Forms, now the Trees

This is a discussion on Continuing the saddle design....Forms, now the Trees within the Saddle Fitting Issues forums, part of the Horse Tack and Equipment category

    Like Tree2Likes

     
    LinkBack Thread Tools
        11-30-2013, 06:35 PM
      #11
    Showing
    .

    Mike, that is even worse.

    What I do not understand is why is the LT so wide, they are supposed to have a 6.5" Gullet.

    You mentioned a 7.25" Gullet and a 7.5" Gullet, those are Narrow Draft and/or Extra Wide QH Trees.

    Of course when they line the bottom of the bars with leather and fleece that will raise the clearance a little bit, bit no way can those tees even come close to working, why they are starting off with 2-3 sizes too wide of a Gullet sized sample tree is very confusing to me......

    From the original fit forms you posted a while back, the LT and J forms looked the closest to me, both have 6.5" Gullets normally and steep rafter angles.

    I would suggest going back to the saddle maker and asking for the trees that are more in line with the Standards that Steele makes, not these Trees that have had 3/4 of an Inch added to the standard Gullet size......

    .
         
    Sponsored Links
    Advertisement
     
        11-30-2013, 06:55 PM
      #12
    Foal
    Kevin, I may have mis-represented the trees in the beginning (likely from my lack of understanding). These are the standard Lt and SE (both+1/2). They sent the SE +1/2 because it was the only one they had. The LT they sent for Joby +1/2 because he currently rides in an extra wide saddle. I understand their reasoning.

    Thinking about the LT on Bart I am now thinking that the back is up so high because the front is too low?
         
        11-30-2013, 09:27 PM
      #13
    Showing
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MikeTucson    
    Kevin, I may have mis-represented the trees in the beginning (likely from my lack of understanding). These are the standard Lt and SE (both+1/2). They sent the SE +1/2 because it was the only one they had. The LT they sent for Joby +1/2 because he currently rides in an extra wide saddle. I understand their reasoning.

    Thinking about the LT on Bart I am now thinking that the back is up so high because the front is too low?
    Yes, the back will flip up when the front is too wide.

    Not sure what brand of X-wide Saddle as brands vary a little, but I just cannot see Joby in any X-Wide Saddle and it fit properly.

    Looking back at all the pics and fit forms, I might suggest Joby with an LT +1/4 (6.75") and Bart with an LT or PJ as a standard 6.5", there are way too many problems with the SE on Bart even with a narrower gullet


    .
         
        12-01-2013, 08:53 PM
      #14
    Super Moderator
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MikeTucson    
    So, no one liked the SE tree (including the saddle fitter). Since I have the LT tree we put it on Bart. It is definitely wayyy too big and it comes up in the back. I am not a fan of the LT for Bart.

    Bart - LT Tree Photos by Mike_and_Helena | Photobucket

    Let me know what you think of this one.

    NO!!

    Can you not see that even without any weight on it, the tree is almost touching the withers? Even with the added leather of the saddle, this will probably do damage to the withers.
         

    Quick Reply
    Please help keep the Horse Forum enjoyable by reporting rude posts.
    Message:
    Options

    Register Now

    In order to be able to post messages on the The Horse Forum forums, you must first register.

    Already have a Horse Forum account?
    Members are allowed only one account per person at the Horse Forum, so if you've made an account here in the past you'll need to continue using that account. Please do not create a new account or you may lose access to the Horse Forum. If you need help recovering your existing account, please Contact Us. We'll be glad to help!

    New to the Horse Forum?
    Please choose a username you will be satisfied with using for the duration of your membership at the Horse Forum. We do not change members' usernames upon request because that would make it difficult for everyone to keep track of who is who on the forum. For that reason, please do not incorporate your horse's name into your username so that you are not stuck with a username related to a horse you may no longer have some day, or use any other username you may no longer identify with or care for in the future.

    User Name:
    Password
    Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
    Password:
    Confirm Password:
    Email Address
    Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
    Email Address:

    Log-in

    Human Verification

    In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


    Old Thread Warning
    This thread is more than 90 days old. When a thread is this old, it is often better to start a new thread rather than post to it. However, If you feel you have something of value to add to this particular thread, you can do so by checking the box below before submitting your post.

    Thread Tools

    Similar Threads
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    Let's talk saddle trees! Ralide Trees? Steele Trees? trailhorserider Horse Tack Reviews 8 03-07-2012 05:35 PM
    Alternative Forms of Exercise SayiWont Plus Sized Riders 16 02-03-2012 09:01 PM
    legal forms ldjs Horse Law 1 07-13-2011 03:00 PM
    Trial Forms FGRanch Horse Talk 3 12-22-2009 05:46 PM
    Forms??? cowgirlfitzy Horse Law 8 11-27-2009 01:10 AM



    All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:23 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
    Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0