While there is a very strong factual base behind his argument, his form of writing is appalling. If he wants to be taken more seriously, especially by the vegan/vegetarian community, he should write like it. I don't know what he's trying to accomplish exactly, but to me it just seems like he's blowing off questionable steam (why so ****ed? There are better things to be irritated about) rather than present something more purposeful and sound of mind. Facts are the strongest argument, throwing around offensive words only makes the writer seem immature.
Another essential flaw. I can't tell whether he's attacking vegetarians/vegans, PETA, or both. Not all PETA members are vegetarian/vegan and not all vegetarians/vegans are PETA members.
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are certain and the intelligent are full of doubt"
Last edited by roro; 07-30-2010 at 02:38 AM.