Showing versus Riding - The Horse Forum
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 6 Old 01-27-2007, 01:24 AM Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 68
• Horses: 0
Showing versus Riding

I have a yearling colt (Mac), I am going to show him Halter this year. He is at a friend's place until I fence my property. Anyway....he is there with his 1/2 brother Rickson (pronounced Hickson), Rickson is going to the trainers to be broke Jan. '08 as a 2 year old or shortly thereafter. I was going to send Mac with Rickson to be broke at the same time as they are the same age but I have been advised to show Mac until he gets his Superior in Halter (if he is that good) and break him after that to ride and whatever else I choose to do with him. I am undecided as to what I am going to do so any advise would be appreciated.

Samantha is offline  
post #2 of 6 Old 02-01-2007, 09:12 AM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 15
• Horses: 0
I would delay breaking him if possible, just because I feel that horses benefit from some more maturity before starting under saddle.

Showing at halter allows you to still work a lot with him, but lets him develop more before he has to have a rider. You can also have him broken with only a couple of rides so that you feel comfortable with his ability to accept a rider when he's older.
daveb is offline  
post #3 of 6 Old 02-03-2007, 12:01 AM Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 68
• Horses: 0
Thanks for the info... :)

Does any one else have an opinion one way or the other?

Samantha is offline  
post #4 of 6 Old 02-03-2007, 01:03 PM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,047
• Horses: 1
I would wait until he was 2 and half or 3 before I had him trained, but thats just me
Friesian Mirror is offline  
post #5 of 6 Old 02-03-2007, 10:48 PM
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeast TN
Posts: 1,146
• Horses: 0
The average horse's growth stops at five- some with a shorter or longer time period depending on the breed. Personally, I wouldn't consider any under saddle work until after the age of three. Even then, if the horse is highly undeveloped, I would post pone. It isn't worth the deterioration and interference with a horse's growth in my perspective. At three, I would consider desensitizing by placing a saddle on the back and exposure to tack. If the horse has developed well, I would break at 3 1/2 with basic walk, trot and canter. Nothing, by any means, grueling.
My horse was finally gelded at the age of eight and then trained to be ridden. Eight is a very long time to wait, yes, but now that he is at the age of 22, I am very happy that he didn't have the unnecessary and stressful training too early - his health reflects that.

Just my opinion.
kristy is offline  
post #6 of 6 Old 02-06-2007, 02:03 PM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 177
• Horses: 0
I have to agree. There's nothing wrong with waiting to start under saddle. There's plenty of work you can do on the ground until the horse is older.
savepitbulls is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Horse Forum forums, you must first register.

Already have a Horse Forum account?
Members are allowed only one account per person at the Horse Forum, so if you've made an account here in the past you'll need to continue using that account. Please do not create a new account or you may lose access to the Horse Forum. If you need help recovering your existing account, please Contact Us. We'll be glad to help!

New to the Horse Forum?
Please choose a username you will be satisfied with using for the duration of your membership at the Horse Forum. We do not change members' usernames upon request because that would make it difficult for everyone to keep track of who is who on the forum. For that reason, please do not incorporate your horse's name into your username so that you are not stuck with a username related to a horse you may no longer have some day, or use any other username you may no longer identify with or care for in the future.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Old Thread Warning
This thread is more than 90 days old. When a thread is this old, it is often better to start a new thread rather than post to it. However, If you feel you have something of value to add to this particular thread, you can do so by checking the box below before submitting your post.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome