Joined
·
9,712 Posts
I've had a really crazy work week, so not much riding, sadly.
I am still on the hunt for a new saddle, and have a wonderful one on trial. I am not so sure the fit is exactly right (****- it's a great deal on exactly what I need). But, I have through the weekend to try it out.
Not sure if anyone is familiar with the Trilogy "Debbie MacDonald" model. I am mostly unfamiliar with the brand, but my saddle fitter mentioned a couple of weeks ago that they are "great for short people"- which I am!- so I was enthusiastic to try it.
I took my first test ride yesterday, and it was certainly a great saddle. I told my trainer, it felt like getting a hug from the saddle! I'm not 100% sure the sizing is right for my horse or for me, but I'm going to ride in it again a couple of times this weekend.
I need to talk to the saddle shop though, as I'm not sure if Trilogy makes a MW in the Debbie MacDonald. That's really what Isabel is. The one I have on trial is an XW, and the only reason I took one that size was that I read they tend to run a bit small, and I thought perhaps the fitter could make it work if it was really sort of a wide. I'm still not certain that will be the case, but I'm not even sure if the equivalent of a MW is available. My guess is these are designed more for big beefy warmbloods?
I didn't spend a lot of time trying it on her without pads yesterday, because she was a bit damp from the rain, but when I did briefly, it definitely sat down on her withers more than I'd like and seemed to really be gaping over them. I will get pictures and probably start a new thread this weekend.
But, because of her slight swayback, I typically ride her with a regular dressage pad plus one of those fleeceworks pads, and when I had her padded up, the spacing over the withers didn't look as weird. I know you want your saddle to fit well without having to use a lot of pads, so that's why I'm thinking this isn't ideal. But here are a couple of pics with the saddle and pads, I wonder if people would think it's a bad fit without knowing hte context:
I rode her in it for about 20 minutes, and at first she was a little hesitant (I think mostly because I was trying to find my balance in it), but she wasn't throwing her head up, pinning her ears, tensing up or anything that would make me think it was sliding around or slamming down on her withers. So maybe there is some hope.
My final question is whether it really fits me. I think I could go with a 17.5" or an 18" seat, depending on the model. This seems to be a bit of a deeper seat than I'm used to in my County, so I'm not sure if it's a tad too tight (I sort of felt like I was humping the pommel- sorry for that description) and my knees were almost coming ahead of the flap. I might be able to adjust my stirrups a bit though to get a better leg position. My husband can come to the barn with me Saturday to take some video, so I think that will help me decide. I'm not usually an indecisive person, but it's been so hard for me to commit to a new saddle.
And I'll end with one more picture of the cute girl herself:
I am still on the hunt for a new saddle, and have a wonderful one on trial. I am not so sure the fit is exactly right (****- it's a great deal on exactly what I need). But, I have through the weekend to try it out.
Not sure if anyone is familiar with the Trilogy "Debbie MacDonald" model. I am mostly unfamiliar with the brand, but my saddle fitter mentioned a couple of weeks ago that they are "great for short people"- which I am!- so I was enthusiastic to try it.
I took my first test ride yesterday, and it was certainly a great saddle. I told my trainer, it felt like getting a hug from the saddle! I'm not 100% sure the sizing is right for my horse or for me, but I'm going to ride in it again a couple of times this weekend.
I need to talk to the saddle shop though, as I'm not sure if Trilogy makes a MW in the Debbie MacDonald. That's really what Isabel is. The one I have on trial is an XW, and the only reason I took one that size was that I read they tend to run a bit small, and I thought perhaps the fitter could make it work if it was really sort of a wide. I'm still not certain that will be the case, but I'm not even sure if the equivalent of a MW is available. My guess is these are designed more for big beefy warmbloods?
I didn't spend a lot of time trying it on her without pads yesterday, because she was a bit damp from the rain, but when I did briefly, it definitely sat down on her withers more than I'd like and seemed to really be gaping over them. I will get pictures and probably start a new thread this weekend.
But, because of her slight swayback, I typically ride her with a regular dressage pad plus one of those fleeceworks pads, and when I had her padded up, the spacing over the withers didn't look as weird. I know you want your saddle to fit well without having to use a lot of pads, so that's why I'm thinking this isn't ideal. But here are a couple of pics with the saddle and pads, I wonder if people would think it's a bad fit without knowing hte context:


I rode her in it for about 20 minutes, and at first she was a little hesitant (I think mostly because I was trying to find my balance in it), but she wasn't throwing her head up, pinning her ears, tensing up or anything that would make me think it was sliding around or slamming down on her withers. So maybe there is some hope.
My final question is whether it really fits me. I think I could go with a 17.5" or an 18" seat, depending on the model. This seems to be a bit of a deeper seat than I'm used to in my County, so I'm not sure if it's a tad too tight (I sort of felt like I was humping the pommel- sorry for that description) and my knees were almost coming ahead of the flap. I might be able to adjust my stirrups a bit though to get a better leg position. My husband can come to the barn with me Saturday to take some video, so I think that will help me decide. I'm not usually an indecisive person, but it's been so hard for me to commit to a new saddle.
And I'll end with one more picture of the cute girl herself:
