The Horse Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.
201 - 220 of 765 Posts
So... what you seem to be saying is, maybe the assumption that 'NH' & 'positive training' generally produces 'spoiled' and never effectively trained animals is no more correct than assuming you're about being cruel by using 'pressure'. ;-)
No, you are missing what I am trying to say.
Good R+ training does not result in spoiling, nor does good R- result in pain or abuse.
Much of the argument here , has involved people trying to use extreme examples, taking tht R- to the max, using abusive techniques, that no one here , esp me, advocates or supports.
My point was merely that applying the same logic taking R+ to the max, and wrongly applied, would go in the extreme in that direction , and produce a spoiled horse, with neither being correct, far as the proper use of either R+ or R-. I have no intention of seeming to support R- used is the wrong manner, then you using R+ in the wrong way. That was my point
 
Probably too much of my life was spent at UK horse auctions because I've seen an awful lot of cruelty being used in the name of 'teaching a horse to do as it's told'. It's everywhere though and on the increase based on the reports on read almost every week in one UK horse magazine
Occasionally I've had to use some form of quite hard punishment on a horse that was going to be dangerous unless very firmly corrected but on the whole unless you go out of your way to buy a very belligerent or challenging horse there isn't a lot of need to be using R- in your training.
How often do people resort to using it because they're the one's that have failed? A lot of the time a horse doesn't do something the way you want it to be done its the training method that's at fault - or the way it's been used, as in incorrectly or inappropriately. The handler/owner at some point didn't make the right thing easy, understandable or didn't have enough patience to do those things
 
What I have 'heard' here... not that anyone NEEDS to 'grab a clicker', but that it is valuable to learn, and that perhaps(not assuming automatically...) if you haven't learned the method fully, then you don't understand it well enough to have a strong opinion on it.

Strong opinions against c/t... or whatever, stated here, do indeed very often come across like trying to 'convert' people. Of course, to hold a strong belief means we'd naturally like others to hold it too. I think that's where we have to choose our words very carefully, in order to remain respectful and considerate of alternate opinions too.

And nowhere here have I 'heard' anyone at all argue against using a 'balance' of +R & -R in 'normal' training. On that note though, re the 'it can be better' comment, I took from what I read, that we weren't talking about 'balance' but about using -R without any significant +R - the 'release of pressure/pat/praise is adequate' type attitude. It does seem to be a very

common belief, and people commonly misunderstand what actual +R is & how it can create a different *attitude*. This is one subject I do have strong opinions about personally, of which I was trying to explain why it matters/is different to me.

Wrong , Loosie.\
Go back enough posts, esp near the beginning, and I mentioned many times in using the right balance of R+ and R- , and in the combo right for a particular horse, esp those with past history, where you need to at first use mainly R+, to help over come fear issues
Actually, much of this endless msi understanding, could have been prevented, by people actually going back and reading everything!
I certainly use a combo, which does not involve clicker training, per say, but I will give a random food reward, such as some beet pulp, after a horse is haltered and led back tot he barn, , or maybe a cookie, after a good ride
I also use scratch at the withers, simply letting a horse stand and rest, or getting off and putting th ehorse away, after a good effort
Perhaps you would condemn me less, actually reading all the posts,where I certainly over and over again, suggested to use the correct combo of R+ and R-!
 
Discussion starter · #205 ·
Using the right balance of R-/R+ means very little if anything to a person trying to learn. If it's the "right" balance, how could it be "wrong"?

But what does the right balance actually mean?

For myself, I think I have found the correct guide to the "right balance".
 
Yeah, and, regardless of neurobiology, there's also the fact that so many people lack thinking & reasoning skills too... :cool: :winetime:
Again, this post was in response to one of Reinins,and others, where horse learning was compared, to be the same as that of a dog or man, and not because I consider horses dumb brutes, and all people to be using their brain,
versus brute strength

Read Chris Irwin and he goes into why training a dog is different, based on the very nature of the two species, which you have to take into account, along with just pure learning pathways> In fact, the quote above, is incomplete, as you left out the other facets that influence the learning of a horse, such as his very herd/prey inborn instincts
Chris goes into the fact that the dog, like us , is a predator, that forms pacts to increase their efficiency in taking down prey, while horses form herds as a prey species for safety, and these factors alone, influence learning and behavioral curves, with horses indeed feeling secure in clear and fair leadership
My quote and reference was merely in response that all creatures learn the same, and while is is perhaps true at the very basic level, there are other influences, as in the very nature of that animal, prey or predator, and in the case of man, brain structure itself-okay?
 
...And on the 'other side' I also see(here & in 'real life') SO many people with a strong attitude against using actual +R, due either to lack of understanding what it is('the only reward a horse(or dog) needs is release of pressure & a Good Boy'...)...But perhaps this is because I come from a 'combo approach' kind of attitude, that I'd feel 'set upon' if I didn't use +R, I don't know...
I think a huge number of horse owners use R+ without calling it that or thinking about it. On the ranch Trooper came from, he was used for sheep instead of cattle - because he seemed to enjoy being around the sheep. His sire was a somewhat dangerous stallion until my friend realized there were two things the stallion liked - going for 50+ mile rides, and working very rough cattle. So he started using the stallion for those sorts of work, and the stallion realized humans enabled him to do things he liked. He eventually became my friends favorite horse, and eventually was used by their teens - but not until the stallion understood working WITH people allowed him to do things he enjoyed.

Cowboy was given to us free because no one at the place where he was a lesson horse wanted him. He had been up for free for several months with no takers. He was a pretty bitter, arena-sour lesson horse. But we eventually found he LOVES going out on trails with the other horses - if he is ridden by a rider who lets him make some of the decisions. We now consider him to be our best trail horse, and in many ways simply our best horse. My wife only recently started riding, and she is learning to ride by riding Cowboy in the desert. If he gets left behind, like he was yesterday...oh boy! He got more exercise racing around the corral and kicking and jumping than he would have going out with us. His hooves are harder than the rocks, and he views the desert as a giant, all-you-can-eat buffet, spread out before him! My wife will sometimes steer him to a spot with something he likes to eat, just so he can grab a bite. In return, when she needs him to do something physically hard - he does it. With enthusiasm! They are a team, riding together.

I don't think many eager horses are created by trying to limit oneself to R+. And most owners don't even think about it. But a lot of owners DO try to find a horse who enjoys the sort of riding the owner enjoys.

When I started handling Bandit's stronger fears by taking him a little way away, then dismounting and showing him, slowly, that the scary thing wasn't scary, I was told he would soon learn to take advantage of me - that horses don't like to be ridden and by dismounting I was "rewarding him". It didn't work that way. Heck, I dismount and walk about once an hour anyway - but Bandit shows no sign that he doesn't want to be ridden. He dislikes being afraid and he dislikes parts of trails that hurt his feet. Can't blame him for either!

Apart from that, he enjoys getting out. In his mind, at least, he is in charge of the herd. He is guiding them, with help from me, through the desert. The grass in our little arena is an immediate reward, and he'd prefer immediate gratification. But once out, he enjoys being in charge...so once we're 1/4 mile or more out, he's happy enough.

I realize it is also common for horse owners to say their horses' desires are irrelevant. It is common, including on this forum, to see "My horse has 23 hours a day to stand and eat. So for MY hour, he can make me happy. IT'S HIS JOB!" No amount of R+ initial training will survive being ridden regularly by someone who believes the horse's JOB is to make the rider happy - at anything the rider wants to do, anytime the rider feels like doing it.

Horse sense used to be a synonym for common sense. If someone had "horse sense", you might fool them for a while, but they would eventually see the truth of the matter. I don't think horses have changed. My horses can see through me, given time. If I want them to enjoy being with me, they eventually respond. Even Trooper, who doesn't like me much, likes me a lot better if I ride him regularly. And if someone believes their horse's job is to make them happy, then horses will figure that out as well. In that situation, R- might be the rider's only option to compel obedience from a horse who would much rather be somewhere else.

For most horses, I don't think R+/R- for teaching cues matters a whole lot. What matters is what happens AFTER the horse learns the cues. Does the rider treat the horse with respect? Do they include "Please" and "Thank you" in their cues? Are they willing to make compromises with their horse? Do they genuinely care about their horse's welfare? Heck, do they even know their horse has a mind and is capable of thought? Are they teachers or trainers? Do they ride the horse's mind, or just sit on top of his body?

In the long run, I think those questions have more to do with a positive approach to horses than how we teach them what a cue means.
 
Using the right balance of R-/R+ means very little if anything to a person trying to learn. If it's the "right" balance, how could it be "wrong"?

But what does the right balance actually mean?

For myself, I think I have found the correct guide to the "right balance".
So, use it. Did I not tell you, that with Hondo;s past history, and you gaining his trust, that you are using what is right for him?
 
...How often do people resort to using it because they're the one's that have failed? A lot of the time a horse doesn't do something the way you want it to be done its the training method that's at fault - or the way it's been used...
"In place of first putting the blame on the horse, which is only natural, the rider ought perhaps begin by trying to find out if he himself is not the culprit." James Fillis, 1890.

There certainly IS a lot of "blame the horse first" going on! Lots of riders ought to be tossed off their horses and given motorcycles or ATVs - something with neither feelings nor thought! It was one of the reasons I stopped taking group riding lessons. It was painful to see horses being ridden by people who didn't seem to know the horses were alive. :angrily_smileys:

@Smilie : Chris Irwin used to have a ton of free videos on Statelinetack. I watched him and listened to his explanations during my first months of owning a horse, and he was a HUGE help! I'd have been lost without his video teachings.
 
I should get off this topic, but , sigh, feel I need to give an example of how the physical brain difference of a horse from a man, can affect behavior and ultimately the learning process.
A horse, doe snot stick his leg through a barb wire fence, and then reason like a human, should he pull back, he is going to tear up his leg. Instead, he reacts instinctively, as a flight animal
We, can however, help him to over come that instinctive reaction, by teaching him to accept leg restraint, so it becomes a learned behavior, even when he sticks that leg into a fence
A horse also does not reason, gee, last time I ate that lush grass/grain, whatever, I got laminitis, so will refrain. Thus, it becomes our responsibility to keep that horse safe from founder
Willing compliance, for me, is a learned behavior using the right combo of R+ and R-, so that it becomes an ingrained reaction for a horse, creating a good and willing good work ethics
Compliance implies that you first ask a horse to do something, with the horse then complying,hopefully in a willing and happy manner, built on trust, repetition, fairness
The cue can be just a voice cue, a look or a soft aid.Horses do learn to willingly move their hips over, with you simply looking at that hip, while saying over
 
BSMS, i have had the chance to watch Chris in person several times. Once was at Spruce Meadows, during the Masters, where he gave a demo.
I have his book, 'Horses Don't lie' If you don't have it, I think you would enjoy reading it
 
...I have his book, 'Horses Don't lie' If you don't have it, I think you would enjoy reading it
Ordered. Less than $6 including shipping!

If it hadn't been for his videos, my horses might have killed me in frustration when I first got them. Simple things like how to approach a horse, how to lead a horse during its first step, how you pick up and support a hoof, what the horse's expression means...it would have taken me YEARS to learn what he taught me by video in weeks!

And I've noticed that HORSES NOTICE those small things, and they treat them as huge things! I had some emotionally shut-down lesson horses turn and stare at me, and a light come on in their eyes, simply by approaching them nicely, leading them correctly and cleaning their hooves in a supportive manner! Do the small things right, and by the time you get in the saddle, the horse will be thinking, "Maybe this is a person I can work with!"

I owe Chris Irwin a big debt, and I never even met the man!
 
Save
He is a neat guy, just not as well known, as many that are more out there, like Buck, B, ect
Chris once started he really doesn't in particular like the term "horse Whisperer applied to him, even though he has a real connection with horses, and like many of these other great horsemen, gotten through to horses that others have given up on, having that 'gift'
 
No, you are missing what I am trying to say.
Good R+ training does not result in spoiling, nor does good R- result in pain or abuse.
That's just what I said I thought you said?? What did I miss??
 
That's just what I said I thought you said?? What did I miss??
Hi Loosie
I must have mis read your reply, as I thought you assumed that I considered all R+ training to result in a spoiled horse, versus just comparing the extreme view of both R+ and R-, being incorrect
Sorry about that, and I did PM you, just to clear up some misconceptions you might have derived from my posts, by not reading the entire thread from the beginning.
 
bSMS, talking of horses noticing the slightest things, which they do, as a prey species, I have a recent good example!
Smilie and Charlie are both together in the drylott over night. In the morning< I often let Smilie out on the back lawn with her grazing muzzle, and Charlie with just her halter and lead shank, while I make up their beet pulp
Anyway, both were grazing around a tree, near the trailer, when Smilie took off snorting and bucking, with Charlie at her heels
I had forgotten about that huge hornet nest, near the bottom of that tree.
Hubby like to collect things, thus, when the weather cooled enough, he harvested that nest, with the intention of hanging it up, after leaving it in the freezer for awhile
He came into the house, and asked me as to which horses had been stung by those hornets. Apparently, when he walked by that corral,carrying that hornet nest, both Smilie and Charlie ran to the far side, snorting!
 
Wrong , Loosie.\ ...
Actually, much of this endless msi understanding, could have been prevented, by people actually going back and reading everything!
No, it's not wrong. It is what *I have heard*, as I said. No, I don't need to read everything, because I'm only responding to what I have read. You are telling me I'm wrong again, without paying attention to what was actually written... or rather, it seems, you're reading between lines, words that just aren't there. As far as I can see, a lot of what you're feeling 'condemned' about is misunderstood *perceptions* of disagreements with you, when there aren't any.

Now, I will leave all that there, and get back on track, to what I initially tried to get across, that I think is SO important to understand.... I am using your words again Smilie, only because I find they're in front of me again, not as a personal attack on you - it isn't in the least. They are also words I've seen commonly elsewhere, not at all just from you. Again, I do appreciate that quite possibly it is just the way you put things here, perhaps how I understand it may not be what you mean, so not assuming your meanings. I'm just using the words that are presented to convey my thoughts...

I will give a random food reward, such as some beet pulp, after a horse is haltered and led back tot he barn, , or maybe a cookie, after a good ride
If I had to pick one factor of training that is MOST VITALLY important to understand, it is timing of 'consequences'. The above to me, sounds like an eg of NOT using food treats as +R for certain behaviours, but just giving 'random food' separate from(after) the 'good' behaviours. It is what gives me the idea people very often just don't understand how to use +R appropriately. People generally understand that timing is so vitally important in 'removing pressure' in the instant of the behaviour, but it seems they think it somehow that doesn't apply to +R - that you can 'reward' a horse separate to a behaviour and the horse will associate the 2. It is just as important to reinforce a horse **at the time of** the behaviour you want to effect, whether you use 'positive' or 'negative'.

I also use scratch at the withers, simply letting a horse stand and rest, or getting off and putting th ehorse away, after a good effort
Again just taking the words that are written, not trying to read between...

These sorts of words are what give me the idea people very often misunderstand what +R/-R actually means. Eg. A scratch on the wither may well be positive reinforcement(something the horse actually desires). But frequently it isn't, or it's a very weak +R at best. Sometimes it may even be UNdesirable, UNpleasant to the horse. We need to consider what, at any given time, for any particular horse is desirable/undesirable, and how 'strong' it may be, if we are to understand how to use effective +R.

People often give egs of letting a horse rest, quitting 'work', letting a horse go, or otherwise 'releasing pressure' as positive reinforcement. There is absolutely no doubt they are valuable 'training tools', but they are egs of negative reinforcement, not +R. Remember, positive reinforcement is the addition of something desirable. Negative reinforcement is the removal of something UNdesirable.

People often also talk about patting(as in light smacking) & praise as egs of +R, of which they're not, although they can *become associated* with +R if they happen repeatedly at the same time as something desirable. That is what is called a 'bridging signal' behaviourally, and is what people use a clicker or whistle(or voice) or such for. As such, if people judge 'clicker training' as worthless, stupid, and yet use praise, it just shows they do not understand the principles behind 'c/t'.
 
Okay, far as that treat, after the horse is haltered, I don;t use treats to catch a horse, but reward that horse after he walks up to me, and is easy to halter. Being haltered, then becomes a positive thing, to the point my horses often try to beat each other to sticking their head in that halter,esp in winter.
Far as that 'good boy, or good girl, or scratch on the withers, I darn well know about timing, and see it used incorrectly all the time
For instance, after a class is over, and the horses are standing in a line up, and the a rider has a favorable placing announced, he will exit that arena, while patting his horse. The horse has no idea as to why he is having that positive feedback, and can connect it to the wrong thing-leaving that arena
The time to have given that horse apositive feedback, was the moment the horse completed that pattern, irregardless of placing, if he gave you an honest and good ride.
I am not un aware of timing, although I do use it more with pressure and release
I have read enough about clicker training, that I think you sell me short, far as not understanding it
Yes, at first the click is given, with that food reward, as soon as the horse gives a correct response. Over time, the click alone is used at times, to let the horse know he responded correctly, and the food reward becomes random.
I just have never had a use for it, and not saying there is none,e sp working with an abused horses, or teaching liberty work, where obviously, you are not going to give either a leg or rein release
Perhaps then, on my horses, that have neither a history of abuse, or of being spoiled, I do use mainly pressure and release, thus classified as R-BUT my horses are happy, loved, work well, are bonded to me like any horse trained with R+ empathize, using empathy, feeling, timing , fairness, and , these factors have served those fathers of NH just fine!
The fact remains, that horses, as a herd species, seek and desire clear and fair leadership. The language of Equus, does snot involve treating fellow herd members, but rather is a language based on body language and herd order
That very language, is based on pressure and release, with that pressure only needing be be asserted strongly once, and then body language so subtle, it is hardly noticed, is used after that. Alead mare , only has to flick an ear, give a look .
Horses also don't hold grudges. Ever see a dominant horse put another horse in his place, then moments later, they are grazing side by side?
In fact, tell me as to how, or what I missed by not using clicker training?
My horses certainly are bonded to me. Even when Einstein or now Charlie were grazing on good pasture, if I called their name, walked up to me, they always greeted me with a nicker
I am not going to be repetitive, by giving examples of trust and love I have shared with my horses, nor the bond I have enjoyed, to the point of loosing a special horse, was like loosing a family member
Please tell me what I am missing??
If I can acknowledge that clicker training has application at times, esp with abused horses, can you not also acknowledge that not using it, creates just as happy horses that become lifetime friends and companions, enjoying what you do together, with neither stress or aversion?????
I am sure Tom Dorrance, and others, never sat and agonized whether some interaction with their horses was either R+ or R-, but just used horse sense, taking into account as to what a horse is, then using empathy, timing, fairness and clear leadership, which builds trust
 
For most horses, I don't think R+/R- for teaching cues matters a whole lot. What matters is what happens AFTER the horse learns the cues. Does the rider treat the horse with respect? Do they include "Please" and "Thank you" in their cues? Are they willing to make compromises with their horse?...
In the long run, I think those questions have more to do with a positive approach to horses than how we teach them what a cue means.
Absolutely agree that what happens after(or around) the teaching specific cues is vital. Also agree, to a degree, that whether (well applied & appropriate for the animal/situation) -R or +R is used, it's probably not going to make a lot of difference to the basic understanding/learning of a specific behaviour. But I do believe it makes a big difference to the *attitude/emotions* behind the behaviour, and that's what I was trying to convey was an important factor to me. What I feel is 'better' than what you get in absence of +R.
 
Oops, for got the target part!
I have actually sat in a few clicker training seminars, as a great variety of speakers are invited every year to the horse breeder and Owner's conference
I have also taken in talks by Grandin, some linda Tellington Jones. Just like taking any clinic, I use what works, makes practical sense to me, as anyone else sure is free to do.
I can see application for clicker training, esp ground work, as on a horse hard to de worm, catch, needs to learn trust, liberty work, etc.
Since I have raised most of the horses I trained, have not needed to work with ahorse, who had no trust, who was perhaps sensitive around the ears, who was hard to catch, ect, ect, so saw no need to use clicker training, although I certainly accept those that feel it's use has application for them-t o use it, same as taking techniques from any trainer, that works for you and your horses
However, if someone can tell me what better connection they achieved with their horse, esp under saddle, using clicker training< i truly would like to know, as I really don't think I could have enjoyed any better bond or connection, with my special horses , than I have done
I can give a horse a pat, a good boy, or good girl, IMMediately after completing a pattern, but I can't exactly click and treat-what am I missing?
If my definition of R+ fails scientific definition, so be it-as my horses certainly understand, and that is what counts!
By the way, Loosie, the emotions and attitude of my horses has always been just fine.
 
201 - 220 of 765 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.